2005
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decontamination of aflatoxin‐contaminated maize by dehulling

Abstract: Dehulling of maize grains as an aflatoxin decontamination method was investigated. Sixty kilograms of maize (whose average moisture content was 110 g kg −1 ) were thoroughly mixed and divided into two samples. The kernel moisture content of one sample was adjusted to 200 g kg −1 while the other (control) was left at 110 g kg −1 . The two samples were kept at ambient temperature (25-30 • C) for 21 days. Twenty sub-samples, ten from each, were further divided into two so that one lot was dehulled while the other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have investigated the effect of various treatments on the levels of these mycotoxins by using processes that mimic the domestic treatment of maize by various population groups prior to consumption (Fandohan et al, 2005) and other commercial processes applied to maize such as extrusion cooking (Bullerman & Bianchini, 2007;Castells, Marín, Sanchis, & Ramos, 2005). Processes such as the de-hulling of maize prior to milling have been shown to result in a significantly decreased mycotoxin contamination (Fandohan et al, 2006;Siwela, Siwela, Matindi, Dube, & Nziramasanga, 2005) and most of the mycotoxins are discarded together with the bran (Siwela et al, 2005). Other physical methods of decontamination of maize grain such as removing spoiled kernels and floatation have been documented in literature (Shetty & Bhat, 1999;Sydenham, Van Der Westhuizen, Stockenstr€ om, Shephard, & Thiel, 1994).…”
Section: Co-occurrence Of Afb1 and Fb1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have investigated the effect of various treatments on the levels of these mycotoxins by using processes that mimic the domestic treatment of maize by various population groups prior to consumption (Fandohan et al, 2005) and other commercial processes applied to maize such as extrusion cooking (Bullerman & Bianchini, 2007;Castells, Marín, Sanchis, & Ramos, 2005). Processes such as the de-hulling of maize prior to milling have been shown to result in a significantly decreased mycotoxin contamination (Fandohan et al, 2006;Siwela, Siwela, Matindi, Dube, & Nziramasanga, 2005) and most of the mycotoxins are discarded together with the bran (Siwela et al, 2005). Other physical methods of decontamination of maize grain such as removing spoiled kernels and floatation have been documented in literature (Shetty & Bhat, 1999;Sydenham, Van Der Westhuizen, Stockenstr€ om, Shephard, & Thiel, 1994).…”
Section: Co-occurrence Of Afb1 and Fb1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siwela et al [19] found that there was a 92% decrease in aflatoxin levels in dehulled maize meal compared with undehulled maize meal. The dehulling of maize grains either manually or mechanically before preparation of food was recommended by Siwela et al [19]. In addition to removing aflatoxins from the outer layer of maize, dehulling removes phytate and reduces the lipid content of the seed, thus improving the storage quality [19] [20].…”
Section: Maize Consumption Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layers removed in the dehulling process are those which are most susceptible to fungal attack and aflatoxin accumulation [17] [18]. Siwela et al [19] found that there was a 92% decrease in aflatoxin levels in dehulled maize meal compared with undehulled maize meal. The dehulling of maize grains either manually or mechanically before preparation of food was recommended by Siwela et al [19].…”
Section: Maize Consumption Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dehulling has been shown to reduce aflatoxin levels by as much as 92% (Siwela et al 2005). If this is the case, the method may prove to be particularly useful in rendering highly contaminated loads suitable for use as animal feed in resistant species.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%