2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927616011715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decontamination in the Electron Probe Microanalysis with a Peltier-Cooled Cold Finger

Abstract: A prototype Peltier thermoelectric cooling unit has been constructed to cool a cold finger on an electron microprobe. The Peltier unit was tested at 15 and 96 W, achieving cold finger temperatures of −10 and −27°C, respectively. The Peltier unit did not adversely affect the analytical stability of the instrument. Heat conduction between the Peltier unit mounted outside the vacuum and the cold finger was found to be very efficient. Under Peltier cooling, the vacuum improvement associated with water vapor deposi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrical conductivity of the uncoated oxidized Bi substrates was sufficient to allow for EPMA analysis without any charging being evident. To minimize carbon contamination, a 10 µ m defocused beam was used in conjunction with a Peltier cooled cold trap (Buse et al, 2016) for all analyses. For each accelerating voltage, a 4 × 3 array of 20 µ m spaced analysis points was acquired, using count times of 60 s on peak and 30 s on each of two background positions for each element line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical conductivity of the uncoated oxidized Bi substrates was sufficient to allow for EPMA analysis without any charging being evident. To minimize carbon contamination, a 10 µ m defocused beam was used in conjunction with a Peltier cooled cold trap (Buse et al, 2016) for all analyses. For each accelerating voltage, a 4 × 3 array of 20 µ m spaced analysis points was acquired, using count times of 60 s on peak and 30 s on each of two background positions for each element line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To change FeLβ f /FeLα f by 1% relative (within measurement error) would require >100 nm of C contamination (calculated using CalcZAF) during the 150 s analysis. This is far more than has been measured in previous studies (e.g., 8 ± 2 nm over 180 s; Buse et al 2016), therefore the effect of contamination can be considered negligible.…”
Section: During Electron Beam Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The rate in an SEM/EPMA then becomes a factor of the chamber vacuum level. The improvement seen in vacuum levels when liquid nitrogen traps are used in the analysis chamber (e.g., Buse et al, 2016) implies that at least the H 2 O is present in the chamber atmosphere and not just adsorbed on the sample surface. The rate of erosion is therefore significantly less limited than is the deposition, since diffusion rates of O 2 and H 2 O in the gas phase would be expected to be significantly higher than for the surface diffusing hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%