2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.036006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconfinement, chiral symmetry restoration and thermodynamics of (2+1)-flavor hot QCD matter in an external magnetic field

Abstract: The entanglement extended Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model at zero chemical potential in the presence of an external magnetic field is studied. The effect of the entanglement parametrization is analyzed, in particular, on the pseudocritical transition temperatures and on the thermodynamical properties of the model. The model predicts that the coincidence or not of both chiral and deconfinement transition temperatures, in the presence of an external magnetic field, depends on the entanglement parametrization c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the rate of this diminishing becomes smaller when the electric field starts to grow, showing a damped behavior. This behavior is analogous to what happens in the pure magnetic case [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. However,when going into the strong field regime, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, the rate of this diminishing becomes smaller when the electric field starts to grow, showing a damped behavior. This behavior is analogous to what happens in the pure magnetic case [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. However,when going into the strong field regime, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The qualitative behavior of the transition temperature for physical quark masses is in disagreement with model calculations using either the (Polyakov-loop extended) Nambu-Jona-Lasinio ((P)NJL) model or the (Polyakov-loop extended) quarkmeson model ((P)QM); in these models, the critical temperature is an increasing function of the magnetic field, see e.g. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Possible resolutions to the disagreement have been suggested [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and we will discuss these at the end of the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The inclusion of a magnetic field in the Lagrangian density of the NJL model and of the PNJL model allows describing the magnetic catalysis (MC) effect, i.e., the enhancement of the quark condensate due to the magnetic field [23][24][25][26], but does not describe the suppression of the quark condensate found in LQCD calculations at finite temperature and zero chemical potential which is due to the strong screening effect of the gluon interactions, the socalled inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC) [16][17][18]. In order to deal with this discrepancy, it was proposed that the model coupling, G s , can be seen as proportional to the running coupling, α s , and consequently, a decreasing function of the magnetic field strength allowing one to include its effects (α s ðeBÞ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%