2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1305.4751
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconfinement and chiral restoration within the SU(3) Polyakov--Nambu--Jona-Lasinio and entangled Polyakov--Nambu--Jona-Lasinio models in an external magnetic field

Márcio Ferreira,
Pedro Costa,
Débora P. Menezes
et al.
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other groups elaborate different QCD-like models at finite (T, µ, eB), that exhibit χSB. The latter consists of, e.g., NJL-model [35,36], Polyakov-linearσ model [37], Polyakov-NJL model [38][39][40], Polyakov-Quark-Meson model [41,42], NJL model including axial chemical potential [43,44], Ginzburg-Landau model [45], charged scalar model with spontaneous χSB [46], NJL model with dynamical AMM generation [47]. Let us notice that the interest on this subject grows up after the still not fully comprehended lattice results by Bali et al in [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many other groups elaborate different QCD-like models at finite (T, µ, eB), that exhibit χSB. The latter consists of, e.g., NJL-model [35,36], Polyakov-linearσ model [37], Polyakov-NJL model [38][39][40], Polyakov-Quark-Meson model [41,42], NJL model including axial chemical potential [43,44], Ginzburg-Landau model [45], charged scalar model with spontaneous χSB [46], NJL model with dynamical AMM generation [47]. Let us notice that the interest on this subject grows up after the still not fully comprehended lattice results by Bali et al in [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported an unprecedented decrease of T c as a function of eB within an ab initio lattice QCD simulation, and declared this as a signature of IMC in this framework. The physical explanation of the phenomenon of IMC is, in particular, still under investigation: In [30,39], the interaction of the magnetic field with the sea quarks leading to a backreaction of the Polyakov loop, and in [35] the magnetic inhibition because of neutral meson fluctuations are made responsible for IMC. In [44], it is explained how IMC is induced by sphalerons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work the parameter space is first constrained at vanishing magnetic field, using the quarks dynamical masses and the meson spectra, and then, at non-vanishing magnetic field strength, the dependence of the dynamical masses of two of the quark flavors (down and strange) is used to fit a magnetic field dependence on the model couplings, both the four-fermion Nambu-Jona-Lasinio interaction and the six-fermion 't Hooft fla-vor determinant while keeping the momentum integration regularization cutoff fixed at its vanishing magnetic field value. This work followed several other works in which it was sought to describe the effect of the inverse magnetic catalysis by using effective models [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, φ 4 -theory [23], chiral perturbation theory [24,25] (However, see also Ref. [26]), the NJL model [27,28], the PNJL model [22,29,30], and the quark-meson (QM) model [28,[31][32][33] all predict this behavior (note however the recent paper where the authors use a B-dependent scale parameter for the Polyakov loop potential to reproduce the lattice results [34]). Furthermore, the PNJL model also predicts a modest split of approximately 2% between the chiral transition and the deconfinement transition, except for Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%