2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12262-008-0049-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decompressive craniectomy: an effective but underutilized option for intracranial pressure management

Abstract: Introduction Decompressive Craniectomy is an effective option in the management of intractable intracranial hypertension. Aim and objectives Neuronal conservation can be achieved by aggressive decompression (hemicraniectomy).Material and methods In this series 12 patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or <8 with increased intracranial pressure underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy.Results The outcomes were prospectively evaluated. Eight patients were victims of traumatic brain injury. There were two p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is a general consensus on the size of the craniectomy bone flap size, 3,4,6 the durotomy shape and the necessity or technique of duroplasty are yet to be standardized. The various techniques described for durotomy are cruiate, 7 horse shoe shaped with the flap reflected toward the superior sagittal sinus and circumpherential 8 with or without radial releasing incisions. 5 Technique of expansion duraplasty has not been elaborated by most of the authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a general consensus on the size of the craniectomy bone flap size, 3,4,6 the durotomy shape and the necessity or technique of duroplasty are yet to be standardized. The various techniques described for durotomy are cruiate, 7 horse shoe shaped with the flap reflected toward the superior sagittal sinus and circumpherential 8 with or without radial releasing incisions. 5 Technique of expansion duraplasty has not been elaborated by most of the authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%