1968
DOI: 10.1021/ja01020a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of vibrationally excited 1,1,1-trideuterio-2,2-difluoroethane

Abstract: Evidence is presented that the vibrationally "hot" molecule CF2HCD3*, formed by the combination of CF2H and CD3 radicals, may decompose by three competing unimolecular processes to form CFH=CD2 + DF, CFD=CD2 + HF, and CF2=CD2 + HD. The second process, a three-center a,a. elimination of HF from the same carbon atom, has not previously been observed. The evidence for the third process, HD elimination, is more tentative. An estimation of the Arrhenius parameters for the decompositions using classical Rice-Ramsper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is excellent agreement between their data and our previous data [2] on this "hot" molecule, the a,a-to +elimination ratio varying from about 0.2 at roorfi temperature to about 0.5 at around 250°C. This marked increase in the ratio with temperature is not readily explained [22].7 RRKM > EoarB for the energy barriers for the two processes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is excellent agreement between their data and our previous data [2] on this "hot" molecule, the a,a-to +elimination ratio varying from about 0.2 at roorfi temperature to about 0.5 at around 250°C. This marked increase in the ratio with temperature is not readily explained [22].7 RRKM > EoarB for the energy barriers for the two processes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the absence of an isotope effect for the a,@ process the critical energy separation is 1 kcal/mole larger. Perhaps fortuitously, the original RRK calculation also gave Ef.O = 64 kcal/mole [2]. However, the RRK calculated value of Ep.8 = 53 kcal/mole [2] is certainly much too low…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations