2008
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-008-0154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of Typha angustifolia and Phragmites australis in the littoral zone of a shallow lake

Abstract: Decomposition of air-dried live Typha angustifolia (L) stems and leaves and Phragmites australis (Cav. Trin ex Steud.) leaves and culms were studied in a shallow freshwater lake (Lake Fehér, Fertő-Hanság National Park, Hungary) using the litter bag technique. Samples were analyzed for dry mass, fiber (cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin) and nutrient (C, N, P, S) contents, litter-associated fungal biomass (ergosterol concentration), potential microbial respiration (electron transport activity: ETS) and celluloly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate the decay rate of litter types in different water depths, we calculated the mass loss as: [(original mass loss -average travel loss for that plant species) -remaining mass]. We t the percent mass lost over time using two models: the single exponential model (k) (Olson, 1963) and the decaying coe cient model (k 1 ) (Godshalk et al 1978), as described by Ágoston-Szabó and Dinka (2008). Decay rates were determined by using a nonlinear leastsquares algorithm to t the percent of dry-weight litter mass remaining over time using the Levenberg-Marquardt method in R. The decaying coe cient model (k 1 ) is the most appropriate decay model for comparisons among different litter types and vegetation communities, and for when the decay rate is expected to uctuate.…”
Section: Decomposition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the decay rate of litter types in different water depths, we calculated the mass loss as: [(original mass loss -average travel loss for that plant species) -remaining mass]. We t the percent mass lost over time using two models: the single exponential model (k) (Olson, 1963) and the decaying coe cient model (k 1 ) (Godshalk et al 1978), as described by Ágoston-Szabó and Dinka (2008). Decay rates were determined by using a nonlinear leastsquares algorithm to t the percent of dry-weight litter mass remaining over time using the Levenberg-Marquardt method in R. The decaying coe cient model (k 1 ) is the most appropriate decay model for comparisons among different litter types and vegetation communities, and for when the decay rate is expected to uctuate.…”
Section: Decomposition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIST OF AUTHORS ÁGOSTON-SZABÓ E. 15, 18, 19, 20, (25), (26), 27,(28) BERCZIK Á. 3, (6), (9), (25), (28) DINKA M. (6), (15), (18), (19), (20), (25), 26, (27), 28 GUTI G. (25) Hufnagel L. (14) KISS A. 1, 2, 3, (6), 7, 8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, (28) Koncz E. (6) Oldal I.…”
Section: Waasen (Hanság)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reed is unique in that it contains plant structures that decompose at different rates (ÁGOSTON-SZABÓ and DINKA, 2008). Leaves decompose much faster than the main body of the plant (DINKA et al, 2004).…”
Section: Macrophyte Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lignin is especially resistant to microbial degradation because of its complex chemistry of cross-linked polymers. Lignin may also reduce bioavailability of other cell wall constituents to decomposition (e.g., ÁGOSTON-SZABÓ and DINKA, 2008).Different plants may also vary in their ability to take up or retain environmental contaminants. Because detritus is an important food source for many organisms, contaminant enrichment may impact food webs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%