2005
DOI: 10.4141/s03-073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of residues and loss of the δ-endotoxin from transgenic (Bt) corn (Zea mays L.) in soil

Abstract: . 2005. Decomposition of residues and loss of the δ-endotoxin from transgenic (Bt) corn (Zea mays L.) in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 85: 19-26. Corn and other crops genetically modified to express the insecticidal δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are grown widely across north America. Studies have shown that the δ-endotoxin can be stabilised on soil colloids where its activity is retained, but reports of direct ecological effects of the δ-endotoxin on soil processes are limited. We have determined the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were previously reported by Hopkins and Gregorich (2003) who observed a close relationship between the degradation of water-soluble components and the Bt protein in a 43-day incubation. Moreover, the dynamic of the Cry1Ac protein degradation was significantly correlated with the dynamic of total C as reported by Hopkins and Gregorich (2005), and was weakly correlated with the total N in the rice residue under both conditions, similar to our previous study (Xiao et al, 2014). These results suggest that the Bt protein degraded with the decomposition of the chemical nutrients in the crop residue, and the presence of the Bt protein does not affect the mass decomposition of the crop residue.…”
Section: Cry1ac Protein Degradationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar findings were previously reported by Hopkins and Gregorich (2003) who observed a close relationship between the degradation of water-soluble components and the Bt protein in a 43-day incubation. Moreover, the dynamic of the Cry1Ac protein degradation was significantly correlated with the dynamic of total C as reported by Hopkins and Gregorich (2005), and was weakly correlated with the total N in the rice residue under both conditions, similar to our previous study (Xiao et al, 2014). These results suggest that the Bt protein degraded with the decomposition of the chemical nutrients in the crop residue, and the presence of the Bt protein does not affect the mass decomposition of the crop residue.…”
Section: Cry1ac Protein Degradationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Given the ecological implications of transgenic plant materials decomposing more slowly in soil, and the controversial nature of research in this field, a number of decomposition studies conducted under field conditions have been undertaken in order to elucidate such discrepancies. None of these studies has found significant differences in either lignin content (Jung and Sheaffer, 2004;Griffiths et al, 2007;Tarkalson et al, 2008) or decomposition rates of Cry1Ab Bt residues as compared to non-Bt residues (Lachnicht et al, 2004;Hopkins and Gregorich, 2005;Cortet et al, 2006;Griffiths et al, 2007). Differential rates of decomposition of different plant parts, on the other hand is commonly observed and is expected considering that corn leaves contain more nitrogen (N) than corn stalks (Jung and Sheaffer, 2004;Tarkalson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Residue Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, there would be further degradation of proteins in the manure due to microbial processes. Even though it has been observed that Cry proteins can bind to certain soil particles (e.g., humic acids, clays) resulting in protection from degradation, a number of studies revealed that there is no accumulation of Cry proteins from GM crops in soil (Herman et al, 2001(Herman et al, , 2002Head et al, 2002;Baumgarte and Tebbe, 2005;Hopkins and Gregorich, 2005;Ahmad et al, 2005;Dubelman et al, 2005;Icoz and Stotzky, 2007;Krogh and Griffiths, 2007;Lawhorn et al, 2009).…”
Section: Environmental Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%