1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf02328101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of nucleic acids and some of their degradation products by microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decomposition of uric acid and urea was tested by the method of Antheunisse (3). Production of indole and acetylmethylcarbinol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition of uric acid and urea was tested by the method of Antheunisse (3). Production of indole and acetylmethylcarbinol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arthrobacter strains AC1 and AC207 are able to utilize uric acid and allantoin as sole sources of carbon, nitrogen, and energy, but in contrast to A. globiformis 4 mol of ammonia is formed instead of urea (16). A. tumescens and A. simplex are uricase negative (16).…”
Section: Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. linens degrades both xanthine and uric acid (481). The latter substance is used as a nitrogen source (481) but not as a nitrogen and carbon source (16). Washed cells convert 1 mol of uric acid or allantoin to 1 mol of urea (16).…”
Section: Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the most complex, recalcitrant compounds (nucleic acids, peptidoglycan, and humics) were generally used poorly in comparison to other substrates. The crystalline and polymerized forms of these compounds makes them refractory to enzymatic degradation although degradation of humic matter [48], nucleic acids [49], and peptidoglycan [36] occurs under certain growth conditions. Thus, the observed low utilization of these recalcitrant substrates relative to the labile substrates may be a function of the minimal media conditions used in the substrate assay in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%