2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-011-0907-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of homogeneous polynomials with low rank

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume A = B. By [1], Lemma 1, we have h 1 (C r (C), I A∪B (1)) > 0. Since C r (C) is a degree r rational normal curve and h 1 (P 1 (C), R) = 0 for every line bundle R on P 1 (C) with degree ≥ −1, we get ♯(A ∪ B) ≥ deg(C r (C)) + 2 = r + 2.…”
Section: The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Assume A = B. By [1], Lemma 1, we have h 1 (C r (C), I A∪B (1)) > 0. Since C r (C) is a degree r rational normal curve and h 1 (P 1 (C), R) = 0 for every line bundle R on P 1 (C) with degree ≥ −1, we get ♯(A ∪ B) ≥ deg(C r (C)) + 2 = r + 2.…”
Section: The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Probably, it is classically known, but we were not able to find a precise reference. It is easy to see that Lemma 2.71 can be improved as follows; see [79]. Lemma 2.73 ([79]).…”
Section: Beyond Sylvester's Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applications, the uniqueness justifies that the computed decomposition is what people wanted. Galuppi and Mella [23] showed that for a generic F ∈ S m (C n ), the Waring decomposition is unique if and only if (n, m, r) = (2, 2k − 1, 2k), (4,3,5) or (3,5,7). When F ∈ S m (C n ) is a generic tensor of a subgeneric rank r (i.e., r is smaller than the value of the Alexander-Hirschowitz formula) and m ≥ 3, Chiantini, Ottaviani and Vannieuwenhoven [8] showed that the Waring decomposition is unique, with only three exceptions: (n, m, r) = (2,6,9), (3,4,8) or (5,3,9).…”
Section: Other Related Work On Waring Decompositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%