Decomposition of Green Agriculture Productivity for Policy in Africa: An Application of Global Malmquist–Luenberger Index

Abstract

Previous research on agricultural productivity in Africa has focused on conventional Total Factor productivity (TFP) growth rather than Green Total factor productivity (GATFP) growth, thus ignoring the effect of undesirable outputs such as emissions. This has raised concerns about the sustainability of agricultural productivity growth in the continent. The study was designed to examine GATFP growth in agricultural productivity for 49 African nations from 2000 to 2019. We apply the Global Malmquist–Luenberger (GML) Productivity Index, which complies with the sustainable development agenda that promotes greater production of desirable outputs and minimising unwanted outputs. This approach is also compared to Global Malmquist (GM) Productivity Index which ignores unwanted outputs, yielding to conventional TFP growth. We found an average GATFP growth of 0.6% and TFP growth at 0.9% suggesting that the actual agricultural productivity growth is overstated if agricultural emissions are disregarded. Both estimates fell short of the desired annual target of 7% from the Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). Regional growth is mostly characterised by high (low) GATFP and TFP except in Southern Africa and East Africa. The two regions represent an ideal situation where GATFP exceeds TFP. At country level growth can be divided into three scenarios: desired growth, where GATFP exceeds TFP; balanced growth with both estimates equivalent; and undesired growth, where TFP exceeds GATFP. Unfortunately, most African nations fall in the last scenario. We conclude that policies must be developed to encourage sustainable agricultural productivity growth in Africa.

The Effect of Industrial Agglomeration on Agricultural Green Production Efficiency: Evidence from China

“…The GML index was utilized to examine the number of changes in agricultural green production efficiency across the reporting periods to better understand the dynamics of agricultural green production efficiency. Because the GML index has greater transferability and continuity than the ML index, thus allowing the potential issue of the ML index's lack of a workable solution to be overcome and permitting technological regression, it is frequently used to quantify green production efficiency [37,38]. The GML index was constructed as follows [39]:…”

Agriculture–Tourism Integration’s Impact on Agricultural Green Productivity in China

“…Output growth effect. Agricultural output includes not only desirable or expected output but also undesirable or unexpected output such as carbon emissions [40,41]. Agricultural tourism products or services have good ecological functions [42,43]; local governments and agricultural tourism entities will inevitably reduce environmental pollution through green technological innovation and ecological environment creation to meet consumers' needs and demands for green consumption.…”

Regional Differences, Distribution Dynamics, and Convergence of the Green Total Factor Productivity of China’s Cities under the Dual Carbon Targets

“…Goto and Sueyoshi [65] employed a convergence model and found that green economic growth in OECD countries did not converge as a whole between 1995 and 2014, but there was club convergence. Myeki et al [66] used the GML index to calculate the agricultural GTFP (GATFP) of 49 African countries from 2000 to 2019. Through comparison, it was found that regional growth was mostly characterized by high GATFP and TFP except in southern Africa and east Africa.…”