1974
DOI: 10.5802/aif.529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition in the large of two-forms of constant rank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following theorem states the necessary and sufficient conditions for the decomposition of a two-form of constant rank 2s in the large. ii) The representation of its normalization as a map w 1 : M → SO(2s)/U(s) arising from any trivialization of S w lifts to SO(2s) [3].…”
Section: The F Irst Obstruction: the Chern Class Of Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following theorem states the necessary and sufficient conditions for the decomposition of a two-form of constant rank 2s in the large. ii) The representation of its normalization as a map w 1 : M → SO(2s)/U(s) arising from any trivialization of S w lifts to SO(2s) [3].…”
Section: The F Irst Obstruction: the Chern Class Of Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ii) The representation of its normalization as a map w 1 : M → SO(2s)/U(s) arising from any trivialization of S w lifts to SO(2s) [3].…”
Section: The F Irst Obstruction: the Chern Class Of Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represents A (n+2) d+1 , the space of normalized 2-forms in R n+2 of rank 2(d + 1), on which the Stiefel bundle V n+2,2(d+1) of orthonormal 2(d + 1)-frames in R n+2 induces a principal U (d + 1)-bundle (see [2,3]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the existence and the decomposability of 2-forms see [2,3,8]. Finally, for 2-forms on spheres see [2,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogously, if w is a 2-form on M of constant rank 2s, the union of the 2i,-planes on which w is of maximal rank forms a sub-bundle Sw of T(M), and the orthogonal-component of w (regarded as a nonsingular, skew-adjoint transformation on Sw) defines a normalized almost-complex ^-substructure (e.g. refer to [3]). We thus have: Existence of an almost-complex s-substructure <=> Existence of a normalized almost-complex ^--substructure <=> Existence of a 2-form on M of constant rank 2s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%