2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77791-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition and Processing of Negative Adjectival Comparatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preliminary evidence they produced suggests a marked difference between the two types: when a two-way ANOVA is performed over data from positive and negative adjectival antonyms and polar quantifiers, an interaction effect emerges. That is, the difference between antonyms is significantly smaller that the difference between polar quantifiers (see also Tucker, Tomaszewicz and Wellwood, 2017 for a recent experimental exploration).…”
Section: Fitting Our Results From Polar Phrasal Comparatives To the New Decmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preliminary evidence they produced suggests a marked difference between the two types: when a two-way ANOVA is performed over data from positive and negative adjectival antonyms and polar quantifiers, an interaction effect emerges. That is, the difference between antonyms is significantly smaller that the difference between polar quantifiers (see also Tucker, Tomaszewicz and Wellwood, 2017 for a recent experimental exploration).…”
Section: Fitting Our Results From Polar Phrasal Comparatives To the New Decmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the polarity effect in quantifiers stems from a "less than" computation (<), as given in the denotations in (5b) and (6b), a similar polarity effect in adjectives is also expected. Indeed, there are some hints that negative adjectives are more cognitively costly than positive adjectives (Clark & Card 1969;Just & Carpenter 1971;Sherman 1976;Tucker, Tomaszewicz & Wellwood 2018), but in these experiments a polarity effect in dimensional adjectives was not the main interest and therefore the contrast was not a clean one. Importantly, it was not directly compared with that of quantifiers.…”
Section: The Similar: Negative Polaritymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Context cannot explain the well-known interaction of polarity with truth value: The polarity effect is smaller for false sentences (i.e., mismatch between sentence and picture) than it is for true sentences. This highly replicable finding suggests that truth value also is an important factor (Agmon et al, 2019;Carpenter & Just, 1975;Just & Carpenter, 1971;Krueger, 1972;Mac-Donald et al, 1992;Mayo et al, 2004;Tucker et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Processing Cost Of Negationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition to the polarity of the sentence which was expressed with yeš or ‘eyn (Sentential Polarity; Polarity-Sen), we added a factor of quantifier polarity (Quantificational Polarity; Polarity-Qua) that can be positive or negative. Negative quantifiers are often analyzed as an instance of implicit negation (Clark, 1976; Heim, 2006; Klima, 1964; Penka, 2011) and evoke a polarity effect in verification tasks relative to their positive counterparts (Deschamps et al, 2015; Just & Carpenter, 1971; Tucker et al, 2018). Specifically in this experiment, we used the comparative quantifiers yoter ( more ) and paxot ( fewer , a one-morpheme word) 7 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%