2020
DOI: 10.3390/math8030436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition and Arrow-Like Aggregation of Fuzzy Preferences

Abstract: We analyze the concept of a fuzzy preference on a set of alternatives, and how it can be decomposed in a triplet of new fuzzy binary relations that represent strict preference, weak preference and indifference. In this setting, we analyze the problem of aggregation of individual fuzzy preferences in a society into a global one that represents the whole society and accomplishes a shortlist of common-sense properties in the spirit of the Arrovian model for crisp preferences. We introduce a new technique that all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we have described a new fuzzy model by means of crisp binary relations similarly as it has been done in other works with the same spirit (e.g. [4,6,22]). We decided to focus on complete preferences instead of general S-connected preferences as a starting point of a more general study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, we have described a new fuzzy model by means of crisp binary relations similarly as it has been done in other works with the same spirit (e.g. [4,6,22]). We decided to focus on complete preferences instead of general S-connected preferences as a starting point of a more general study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that other models in the literature use qualitative formulations of the independence of irrelevant alternatives property (see [7,19]). In these models, it is quite natural to build associated preorders compatible with the IIA property and use them to describe the aggregation function (as we made in [22]). However, in this paper, the qualitative IIA is a consequence of the quantitative IIA and the completeness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But, without this condition, if X = {x, y} and a fuzzy binary relation R on X is defined as R(x, y) = R(y, x) = R(x, x) = R(y, y) = 1, it decomposes to (P, I) with I(x, y) = I(x, x) = I(y, y) = 1 and P(x, y) = 0.5 and 0 otherwise. Finally, in a previous paper [23] the authors proved some necessary conditions for these kinds of decompositions. We will include them here for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: Decompositions Of Fuzzy Binary Relationsmentioning
confidence: 97%