2016
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1156233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposing the bias in time-series estimates of CAPM betas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been examined first by Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972) and subsequently by Blume and Friend (1973), Fama and Macbeth (1973) and Kon and Lau (1979). The biases in betas and by extension alphas estimated by CAPM-based models are inherent in models themselves (Malloch, Philip, & Satchell, 2016). Due to this, the validity of the benchmark portfolio of equivalent risk against which the fund returns are compared becomes suspect.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been examined first by Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972) and subsequently by Blume and Friend (1973), Fama and Macbeth (1973) and Kon and Lau (1979). The biases in betas and by extension alphas estimated by CAPM-based models are inherent in models themselves (Malloch, Philip, & Satchell, 2016). Due to this, the validity of the benchmark portfolio of equivalent risk against which the fund returns are compared becomes suspect.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is the underestimation of the market risk premium and overestimation of the other risk premiums (Shanken, 1992;Kim, 1995). Alternative methods of estimations to overcome the EIV problem have been proposed by Gibbons (1982), Shanken (1992), Kim (1995) and Malloch, Philip and Satchell (2016).…”
Section: Criticisms On Capm and Empirical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%