2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-011-9570-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposing Strain Maps Using Fourier-Zernike Shape Descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for fingerprint recognition [11] and human face recognition [12] can be appropriately adapted for this purpose. Orthogonal decomposition to reduce the dimensionality of 'raw' data has been recently applied to displacement and strain image decomposition [13][14][15], as well as to finite element model updating [16]. Orthogonal polynomials, such as Zernike, Tchebichef or Krawtchouk are advantageous because they are very effective in data reduction and are also invariant to scale, rotation and translation, thus enabling direct comparison of results regardless of whether the data fields are in the same coordinate system, have the same scale, orientation, or sampling grid.…”
Section: Decomposition Of Displacement and Strain Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for fingerprint recognition [11] and human face recognition [12] can be appropriately adapted for this purpose. Orthogonal decomposition to reduce the dimensionality of 'raw' data has been recently applied to displacement and strain image decomposition [13][14][15], as well as to finite element model updating [16]. Orthogonal polynomials, such as Zernike, Tchebichef or Krawtchouk are advantageous because they are very effective in data reduction and are also invariant to scale, rotation and translation, thus enabling direct comparison of results regardless of whether the data fields are in the same coordinate system, have the same scale, orientation, or sampling grid.…”
Section: Decomposition Of Displacement and Strain Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, each deviation d i is multiplied by a respective weighting parameter p i resulting in the following expression (10) For each moment, the weighting parameter is expressed by the ratio of the magnitude of the moment to the sum of all moments: (11) and (12) While this can be done independently for moments from the simulation and experiment, it is more appropriate to use an average value for the moment pair such that the sum of average values of the normalization parameters remains equal to unity, i.e. (13) Hence combining Equations (10) and (12) leads to the following expression for the weighted average deviation (14) The weighted and non-weighted average deviations for the displacements and strain fields in regions 1 and 2 are presented in Table 3, from which general indications about the model quality may be drawn, although the type of error norm applied (weighted or non-weighted) influences significantly the conclusion. Table 3: Weighted and non-weighted average deviation based on equations (10) and (14) respectively, for the moments representing the displacement and strain data fields for the regions shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Error Norm Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The capabilities of DIC performed for high-speed events offer the potential for more rigorous validation and refinement of computational solid mechanics models, which is essential for high-fidelity simulations, 6 but create the challenge of how to quantitatively compare data-rich displacement and/or strain fields from experimentation and simulation. It has been shown previously that shape or image descriptors can be used to represent strain fields with reduced dimensionality 7 and employed in validation procedures, 8 in static or pseudo-static load cases, and for finite element (FE) updating in both static 9 and vibration 10 loading cases. For the latter cases, the frequency response function of the shape features has been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These descriptors tend to be easier to compute and exhibit better information-preservation than contourbased descriptors and most region-based descriptors, such as Zernike moments; 13 however Fourier descriptors do not achieve any data compression. This combination of advantages and disadvantages led Patki and Patterson 6,14 to propose a new shape descriptor viz. the Fourier-Zernike descriptors in which Zernike moments are evaluated for the Fourier transform of a strain map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%