2001
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-1-83-2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposing spatio-temporal seismicity patterns

Abstract: Abstract. Seismicity is a distributed process of great spatial and temporal variability and complexity. Efforts to characterise and describe the evolution of seismicity patterns have a long history. Today, the detection of changes in the spatial distribution of seismicity is still regarded as one of the most important approaches in monitoring and understanding seismicity. The problem of how to best describe these spatiotemporal changes remains, also in view of the detection of possible precursors for large ear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of H ** to clustering naturally leads to the question if our approach might be useful in achieving the largely unreached goal of separating correlated from uncorrelated earthquakes. As all conventional declustering methods require the definition of internal parameters as e.g., pre‐defined space‐time windows [e.g., Goltz , 2001] our approach has the clear advantage of no internal parameters at all. We therefore propose to include configurational entropy in the process of earthquake declustering, at least for testing the results of other methods, and will adress this issue in a future paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of H ** to clustering naturally leads to the question if our approach might be useful in achieving the largely unreached goal of separating correlated from uncorrelated earthquakes. As all conventional declustering methods require the definition of internal parameters as e.g., pre‐defined space‐time windows [e.g., Goltz , 2001] our approach has the clear advantage of no internal parameters at all. We therefore propose to include configurational entropy in the process of earthquake declustering, at least for testing the results of other methods, and will adress this issue in a future paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, such an approach has brought to light new properties of the clustering of seismicity in space and time [ Bak et al , 2002; Corral , 2003, 2004; Davidsen and Goltz , 2004; Davidsen and Paczuski , 2005; Baiesi and Paczuski , 2005], which can potentially be exploited for earthquake prediction [ Goltz , 2001; Tiampo et al , 2002; Baiesi , 2006]. One aim has been to evaluate distances between subsequent events, including temporal and spatial measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Lin [2011] used PCA and image processing to identify ionospheric total electron content anomalies before a strong earthquake. C. Goltz [2001] used PCA to study the seismicity of the Southern California area and discussed the promising results in view of their implications, potential applications and possible precursory qualities. Fang Y et al [2015] identified possible short-and medium-term earthquake precursors before the Lushan earthquake by using PCA to investigate the cross-fault data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%