2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposable partial actions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove this by induction on k. Since A (1) α ( 1) G = A (1) by Example 2.2 and A (1) is a quotient of A, this follows from (E). Assume we have proved it for k − 1, and let us prove it for k. Since P passes to extensions by (E), the exact sequence in (4.5) implies that it suffices to show that D (k) δ (k) G satisfies P. Combining (D.2) and Theorem C in [2], it follows that D (k) δ (k) G is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of algebras of the form…”
Section: Moreover D (K)mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We prove this by induction on k. Since A (1) α ( 1) G = A (1) by Example 2.2 and A (1) is a quotient of A, this follows from (E). Assume we have proved it for k − 1, and let us prove it for k. Since P passes to extensions by (E), the exact sequence in (4.5) implies that it suffices to show that D (k) δ (k) G satisfies P. Combining (D.2) and Theorem C in [2], it follows that D (k) δ (k) G is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of algebras of the form…”
Section: Moreover D (K)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this section, we explore the structure of the crossed products and fixed point algebras of partial actions with finite Rokhlin dimension. Our approach makes use of the decomposition property introduced and studied in [2], which we recall in §4.1. For unital partial actions, a more direct argument can be given, which even yields better results (notably in the zero-dimensional case).…”
Section: Structure Of the Crossed Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations