2009
DOI: 10.1021/ie800976v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposability of the Control Structure Design Problem of Recycle Systems

Abstract: The control structure design is an important part of process synthesis tasks. The design becomes more difficult if recycle is present in the process to be controlled. The objective of this work is to clear up if the control structure design should be completed for the whole process simultaneously or it can be decomposed into subproblems involving only one unit of the whole system. Investigations show that the recycle can have an effect on the control structure that complicates the design problem. Simple case s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the large number of variables and a combinatorial growth in the total number of possible control structures with respect to the number of variables, a complete dynamic evaluation of all alternative control structures is impractical for any realistic process. To deal with this disadvantage, several researchers decomposed the problem into a hierarchy of decisions,206–209 motivated by Douglas's hierarchical procedure for conceptual process design 210. In this approach, some alternatives are eliminated according to economic, environmental, or controllability considerations at each level of hierarchy.…”
Section: Process Design Methods For Improving Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the large number of variables and a combinatorial growth in the total number of possible control structures with respect to the number of variables, a complete dynamic evaluation of all alternative control structures is impractical for any realistic process. To deal with this disadvantage, several researchers decomposed the problem into a hierarchy of decisions,206–209 motivated by Douglas's hierarchical procedure for conceptual process design 210. In this approach, some alternatives are eliminated according to economic, environmental, or controllability considerations at each level of hierarchy.…”
Section: Process Design Methods For Improving Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the large number of variables and a combinatorial growth in the total number of possible control structures with respect to the number of variables, a complete dynamic evaluation of all alternative control structures is impractical for any realistic process. To deal with this disadvantage, several researchers decomposed the problem into a hierarchy of decisions, [206][207][208][209] motivated by Douglas's hierarchical procedure for conceptual process design. 210 In this approach, some alternatives are eliminated according to economic, environmental, or controllability considerations at each level of hierarchy.…”
Section: Sequential Design Methods For Improving the Plant-wide Contromentioning
confidence: 99%