Decolonizing knowledge of and from Okinawa

Nishiyama, Hidefumi

doi:10.1080/14672715.2022.2136098

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ranging from noise and accidents during military training to murder and sexual violence by the service members, the military presence continues to cause violence against Okinawans (Nishiyama, 2022). Facing such militarised and colonial conditions in their everyday lives, Okinawans have long been engaging in various demilitarising and decolonial movements.…”

Section: The Okinawan Indigenous Movementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decolonial encounter with neo‐nationalism: The politics of indigeneity and land rights struggles in Okinawa

Nishiyama

2022

Trans Inst British Geog

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to make a contribution to ongoing debates in decolonial, indigenous, and island geographies through a case study of the Okinawan indigenous movement and its recent encounter with a neo-nationalist, and in effect neocolonial, movement. The Okinawan indigenous movement emerged against the backdrop of the continuing US military presence on Okinawa Island, which is the direct result of the post-war American military occupation and continues to be maintained by Japanese post-colonial policies. In the early 2000s, the movement achieved indigenous recognition by United Nations human rights bodies, which have since issued recommendations to the Japanese government to implement protective measures for the islanders, including indigenous land rights measures that are hoped to alleviate the militarised colonial situation. Not only does the Japanese government continue to ignore the recommendations, but the Okinawan indigenous movement today also confronts a new form of neocolonialism. In the past few years, a group of neo-nationalists and conservative politicians have initiated a countermovement against the Okinawan indigenous status. They have mobilised the unpopularity of the term 'indigenous people' in Japanese ('senjūmin') among Okinawans as a pretext for demanding the retraction of the recommendations. The case study shows that the different conceptualisations of decolonisation and indigeneity represent not only an analytical usefulness but also an empirical importance for they create a space in which these ideas can be (ab)used to both promote and hinder a decolonial pursuit of the reappropriation of colonised (is)lands. It illustrates a particular geopolitics of knowledge in which different actors mobilise different understandings of decolonisation and indigeneity for a decolonial or neocolonial end. The paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges for decolonial geographies that arise from the present study.

show abstract

Section: The Okinawan Indigenous Movementmentioning

confidence: 99%