Abstract:Objective: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) is a multifaceted concept that acknowledges that a person's wellbeing is determined by a range of inter-related domains: body, mind and emotions, family and kinship, community, culture, Country, and spirituality. This paper explores the meaning of these seven domains of SEWB. Method: A thematic analysis of qualitative data obtained from the National Empowerment Project (NEP) was conducted, along with a literature … Show more
“…The National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples' Mental Health and Social and Emotional Wellbeing 2017–2023 (Commonwealth of Australia, ) argues for a new approach that prioritises Aboriginal leadership and partnership and incorporates social determinants of mental health, the need to address racism, building person‐centred, trauma‐informed, culturally and clinically appropriate healthcare systems. This systematic review, responds to calls to build an evidence‐base for Indigenous self‐determined (The United Nations General Assembly, ), person‐centred (Sayers, Cleary, Hunt, & Burmeister, ; Talerico, O'Brien, & Swafford, ), culturally responsive health‐care (Dudgeon, Bray, D'Costa, & Walker, ; Dudgeon, Calma, Brideson, & Holland, ; National Inquiry Concerning the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness, ) by analysing Aboriginal perspectives of SEWB programs.…”
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities have been targets of social and emotional wellbeing programs for many years. However, the few health‐care programs and services that are evaluated rarely provide insight into the participants' perspectives of program success or failure. This systematic review assessed 33 social and emotional wellbeing programs across Australia to better understand what Aboriginal community members think about the programs and how they could be improved. Results highlighted the interesting and valuable insights provided by Aboriginal participants, including what kinds of program activities and approaches are most suitable, what program characteristics are successful or desired, and their experiences of wellbeing change before and after program participation. They likewise voiced opinions about poorly received programs, culturally inappropriate services and negative experiences. This review highlighted how health and wellbeing programs must better engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients to ensure that services are culturally safe, holistic, integrate appropriate staffing, include culturally relevant activities and value patient/participant experiences. These findings have significant implications for the health and wellbeing sector; specifically, research, policy, program design and implementation, evaluation methods, and self‐determination.
“…The National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples' Mental Health and Social and Emotional Wellbeing 2017–2023 (Commonwealth of Australia, ) argues for a new approach that prioritises Aboriginal leadership and partnership and incorporates social determinants of mental health, the need to address racism, building person‐centred, trauma‐informed, culturally and clinically appropriate healthcare systems. This systematic review, responds to calls to build an evidence‐base for Indigenous self‐determined (The United Nations General Assembly, ), person‐centred (Sayers, Cleary, Hunt, & Burmeister, ; Talerico, O'Brien, & Swafford, ), culturally responsive health‐care (Dudgeon, Bray, D'Costa, & Walker, ; Dudgeon, Calma, Brideson, & Holland, ; National Inquiry Concerning the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness, ) by analysing Aboriginal perspectives of SEWB programs.…”
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities have been targets of social and emotional wellbeing programs for many years. However, the few health‐care programs and services that are evaluated rarely provide insight into the participants' perspectives of program success or failure. This systematic review assessed 33 social and emotional wellbeing programs across Australia to better understand what Aboriginal community members think about the programs and how they could be improved. Results highlighted the interesting and valuable insights provided by Aboriginal participants, including what kinds of program activities and approaches are most suitable, what program characteristics are successful or desired, and their experiences of wellbeing change before and after program participation. They likewise voiced opinions about poorly received programs, culturally inappropriate services and negative experiences. This review highlighted how health and wellbeing programs must better engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients to ensure that services are culturally safe, holistic, integrate appropriate staffing, include culturally relevant activities and value patient/participant experiences. These findings have significant implications for the health and wellbeing sector; specifically, research, policy, program design and implementation, evaluation methods, and self‐determination.
“…The importance of recognising the contributions of Indigenous concepts of SEWB is also the focus of Decolonising Psychology: Validating Social and Emotional Wellbeing (Dudgeon, Bray & D'Costa, Walker, 2017) which uses findings from the National Empowerment Project to explore the seven domains of SEWB, namely body, mind and emotions, family, community, culture, Country, and spirituality. In this article, Dudgeon, Bray, D'Costa, and Walker (2017) highlight how SEWB, (an emerging concept within Indigenous psychology), is important in holistically addressing the well being needs of Indigenous people.…”
“…For example, Duran & Duran's () book “Native American Postcolonial Psychology” set a foundation for embracing an Indigenous psychology grounded in differing cosmologies—that is, a psychology that legitimatizes and engages with the unique and valid worldview of Indigenous peoples. More recently, in 2017, the “Australian Psychologist” published a special issue on “Australian Indigenous Psychology” (Dudgeon, ) that includes a number of articles focused on “closing the mental health gap” including understanding the Aboriginal concept of social and emotional well‐being (Calma, Dudgeon, & Bray, ) and the necessity of decolonizing psychology (Dudgeon, Bray, D'Costa, & Walker, ).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.