Decolonial theory and disability studies: On the modernity/coloniality of ability

Abstract

This paper applies a decolonial approach to hegemonic psychological science by engaging marginalized knowledge perspectives of Disability Studies (DS) to reveal and disrupt oppressive knowledge formations associated with standard understandings of ability. In the first section of the paper, we draw upon mainstream DS scholarship to challenge individualistic orientations to disability (evident in the medical model and positive psychology perspectives) that pervade psychological science. The purpose of this approach is to normalize disability by thinking through disabled ways of being as viable and valuable. In the second section of the paper, we draw upon critical race and global disability perspectives to denaturalize hegemonic accounts of ability. Rather than essential properties of human bodies and minds, the capabilities of the modern subject reflect technological and ideological investments that enable a privileged few, while disabling the marginalized global majority. We conclude by discussing implications of decolonial theory for DS and ways in which considerations of disability subjectivity can inform the decolonial project.

Disparities in Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services at the Intersection of Disability and Female Adolescence in Tanzania

“…This tension between the approaches could be used to recognise a continuum between charity and rights approaches. Such non-binary thinking is certainly a lesson to learn from the southern perspectives on disability [ 60 , 61 ].…”

Decolonising Political Communication in Africa

“…(Peter Ncube, 2019). By contesting modern individualistic models of mental illness, coloniality of disability (Dirth and Adams, 2019) provides a tool to "normalise" and, at the same time, contextualise deviant behaviour such as the one depicted in the video within socio-historical processes. On the one hand, this suggests the use of mental illness to explain violent and irrational behaviour by a member of the "civilised" group, a practice seldom employed with colonised subjects.…”

Epistemic Violence in Research on Eldercare

“…The view from this standpoint helps to illuminate how the naturalisation of these selfways reinforces and legitimises modern/colonial lifestyles and related cultural patterns that negatively impact elders. These include not only such relational forms as neolocal residence, romantic love and concentration of care in the nuclear family (Adams et al, 2019) but also conceptions of ability or competence that devalue elders’ skills and potential contribution to collective activity (Dirth & Adams, 2019).…”