2020
DOI: 10.2979/reseafrilite.50.4.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decolonial Temporalities in Tsitsi Dangarembga's <em>The Book of Not</em>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also because of this fluidity that there arise challenges about locating specific African writers. For example, although I present Tsitsi Dangarembga as a second-generation writer, Gulick (2019) hints that she is a first-generation writer, while Adesanmi and Dunton (2005) classify her as a thirdgeneration writer. In fact, Mukoma Wa Ngugi (2018) suggests that the so-called first-generation writers are better classified as the "Makerere generation", given that the term "first-generation" excludes the work of South African writers (such as Samuel Mqhayi, Sol Plaatje, AC Jordan, Thomas Mofolo and RRR Dhlomo) who were writing in (South) African languages long before writers such as Achebe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also because of this fluidity that there arise challenges about locating specific African writers. For example, although I present Tsitsi Dangarembga as a second-generation writer, Gulick (2019) hints that she is a first-generation writer, while Adesanmi and Dunton (2005) classify her as a thirdgeneration writer. In fact, Mukoma Wa Ngugi (2018) suggests that the so-called first-generation writers are better classified as the "Makerere generation", given that the term "first-generation" excludes the work of South African writers (such as Samuel Mqhayi, Sol Plaatje, AC Jordan, Thomas Mofolo and RRR Dhlomo) who were writing in (South) African languages long before writers such as Achebe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%