with Truth is a reminder of the power but ultimately fallacy of memory, or rather put more forgivingly, the unreliability of memory. The complexities of remembering (and consequently forgetting) are the gray zones that narrative nonfiction trespasses. A great example of this is the much-contested work of Jacob Dlamini, Native Nostalgia, that Twiddle thoroughly engages with. This is an important text in post-apartheid South Africa dealing with the question of memory and nostalgia, wherein to the dismay of many Black South Africans, Dlamini speaks of Black joy even during apartheid. Dlamini is accused of making light of apartheid, but as Twidle argues, Native Nostalgia was not popular because it does "not easily fit received narrative templates premised on progressive and closure, and cannot be resolved into the binary of 'victims' and 'perpetrators' as formulated by the TRC Final Report" (49). What is at stake here with Experiments with Truth, as what is at stake with narrative nonfiction in post-TRC South Africa, is "debates about historiography, knowledge production, and the ethics of representation" (20). In post-apartheid South Africa, whether it is debates about language and accents, about memory and remembering, about whiteness and privilege, about middle-class blackness and access, about who can write about whom and under what conditions-South Africans are grappling with anxieties produced by a society under momentous transition. Ultimately, Twidle and the nonfiction works he critically engages points us to "post-apartheid intellectual possibility" (139). That through the critical reading of post-TRC texts, we should endeavor to engage the ways that history is shifting, to confront our culpability in the present, and how we imagine the South Africa to come. In other words, we must be wary of the metanarratives of the past, like that of "victims" and "perpetrators," and how they shape (and often limit) our engagements with the present.