2022
DOI: 10.1177/02632764211073011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decolonial and Ontological Challenges in Social and Anthropological Theory

Abstract: In this article, I examine the conceptual and methodological points of convergence and divergence of two intellectual currents frequently referred to as the decolonial and ontological turns in social and anthropological theory. Salient points considered are the ways both theoretical projects unsettle modernity’s dominant ontological and epistemological foundations by seriously engaging the conceptual potential of thinking with (ethical dimension) alterity and from (geopolitical dimension) exteriority. I compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For other communities, such as Indigenous communities, archaeology may be considered a relational ceremony (Tuhiwai Smith 2012; Wilson 2008). Decolonization, in practice, challenges the material systems perpetuating colonialism (e.g., Fúnez-Flores 2022). For example, land acknowledgments are increasingly made, for example, at conferences and universities, and in email signatures, but whom do they serve—the Native communities they acknowledge or the non-Native communities who present them?…”
Section: Critical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other communities, such as Indigenous communities, archaeology may be considered a relational ceremony (Tuhiwai Smith 2012; Wilson 2008). Decolonization, in practice, challenges the material systems perpetuating colonialism (e.g., Fúnez-Flores 2022). For example, land acknowledgments are increasingly made, for example, at conferences and universities, and in email signatures, but whom do they serve—the Native communities they acknowledge or the non-Native communities who present them?…”
Section: Critical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous American thought is barely mentioned, and Indigenous American scholars are equally rarely mentioned. Indigenous scholars like Jairo Fúnez-Flores have highlighted that postcolonialism still maintains a largely Eurocentric/Francocentric focus (Fúnez-Flores, 2022 ) conceptually and in practice. This is important because Indigenous pragmatism and thought are present in the very ideas that Go mentions as core to the postcolonial framework, even unintentional omissions such as this continue to perpetuate internal colonialism and their omission weakens analyses of Indigenous communities under these frameworks.…”
Section: Postcolonial Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This call for recognition of Indigenous philosophies and frameworks is already an established tradition, but it has received little attention by much of Global North scholarship. Scholars like Jairo Fúnez-Flores are publishing important articles that highlight the strong and determined resistance of Global North academies and institutions to Indigenous knowledge and frameworks (Fúnez-Flores, 2022) as well as engaging with these ideas in a public sociology through the medium of social networks like Twitter. Additionally, the important canon of work from prominent scholar Pablo González Casanova-father of sociology in Mexico and Zapatista comandante-constitute what he calls the Theory of the Jungle/Theory of the Rain Forest (González Casanova, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Bhambra and Holmwood 2021 : 209). Fúnez-Flores ( 2022 : 26) has recently argued similar, noting that decolonial theory should work towards reconceptualising our current ‘social totality’ as the ‘modern/colonial capitalist world system’. It is within this remit that this paper works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%