2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.72.062304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoherence in quantum walks on the hypercube

Abstract: We study a natural notion of decoherence on quantum random walks over the hypercube. We prove that this model possesses a decoherence threshold beneath which the essential properties of the hypercubic quantum walk, such as linear mixing times, are preserved. Beyond the threshold, we prove that the walks behave like their classical counterparts.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At that point we can apply the usual projectors Π 0 and Π 1 to determine the probabilities of measuring 0 or 1 as a function of time. The result (see Alagić and Russell (2005) for details) is…”
Section: Effects In the Walk On The Hypercubementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At that point we can apply the usual projectors Π 0 and Π 1 to determine the probabilities of measuring 0 or 1 as a function of time. The result (see Alagić and Russell (2005) for details) is…”
Section: Effects In the Walk On The Hypercubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is that the continuous-time quantum walk hits exactly, while the discrete-time quantum walk hits with a probability that is less than one: see Kempe (2003b;2005) for details. For a fixed p > 4k, Alagić and Russell (2005) shows that the walk behaves much like the classical walk on the hypercube, the measurement distribution of the walk converges to the uniform distribution in time M( ) = Θ(n log n), just as in the classical case.…”
Section: Effects In the Walk On The Hypercubementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, coin decoherence produces a transition from behavior characteristic of a quantum walk in which the standard deviation of the walk grows linearly in time to behavior characteristic of a classical walk in which the standard deviation varies as the square root of time [30,[30][31][32][33][34][35]. Previous decoherence models for quantum walks considered a scattering step which is a unitary action with probability 1 − p, and a unitary action followed by a projective measurement with probability p [30][31][32][33]. Models in which measurements on the coin yield less than total information have also been considered [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%