2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.79.052320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoherence from spin environment: Role of the Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, all the spins of the lattice were coupled to the TLS (M is set to N ) with uniform coupling strength [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] or site-dependent coupling strength. 45 The latter reflects the actual coupling strength of the TLSlattice interactions that depend on the location of the TLS in the spin lattice.…”
Section: Spin-lattice Subenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, all the spins of the lattice were coupled to the TLS (M is set to N ) with uniform coupling strength [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] or site-dependent coupling strength. 45 The latter reflects the actual coupling strength of the TLSlattice interactions that depend on the location of the TLS in the spin lattice.…”
Section: Spin-lattice Subenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Moreover, molecular magnet systems 32,33 and Josephson junction systems 34,35 are described by this model. In the past, various forms of a 1D spin lattice, such as the Ising, 36,37 XY , [38][39][40][41][42] and XXZ [43][44][45] models, have been investigated. Such spin-lattice systems, when isolated, exhibit quantum phase transitions depending on the system parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with q = A, B summed over. In the same way as above, the effective potential from the qubit can be included by simply replacing h by h + δ in (15). Since H k conserves the number parity (even or odd number of electrons), it is sufficient to consider the even-parity subspace of the Hilbert space, spanned by…”
Section: A Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the physics behind the different behaviors of the LE at the IP (J e = J o ) and away from the IP (J e = J o ), let us recall that the oscillation amplitudes in (20) are made up of products of state overlaps F m,k = | ψ m,k (δ)|ψ 0,k (0) | 2 (m = 0, ..., 7). Knowing that |ψ m,k (0) is an eigenstate of H k in (15), implying that ψ m,k (0)|ψ 0,k (0) = δ m0 (up to a normalization factor), one may be tempted to argue that ψ m,k (δ)|ψ 0,k (0) must be very small for all m = 0 since δ is a small perturbation. If this were the case, however, all oscillation amplitudes in (20) would be vanishingly small for any k, resulting in a non-decaying LE with a value close to unity.…”
Section: B Loschmidt Echo: Zero Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, one can identify the quantum phase transition through the quantum-classical transition of the system described by a reduction from a pure state to a mixture 14 . This stimulates a series of works regarding the disentanglement of central spins subjected to critical surrounding environment 10 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 . It was shown that at the critical point where the environment occurs QPT, the decoherence is enhanced, and the disentanglement process is accelerated by the quantum criticality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%