2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding semantic representations in mind and brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What then do distributional semantic models provide for us in the context of our study? Although they do not capture the conceptual richness of the words as they functioned when originally uttered, nor for that matter nonlinguistic, sensorimotor experiences that undoubtedly shape meaning (Binder et al., 2016; Frisby, Halai, Cox, Lambon Ralph, & Rogers, 2022), they do allow insight into the semantic relatedness between utterances that are not restricted to strict lexical overlap. But it is important to keep in mind that this semantic relatedness is ultimately that which exists in a high‐dimensional vector space derived from pre‐existing text (in the case of our use of word2vec, billions of words from Google News).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What then do distributional semantic models provide for us in the context of our study? Although they do not capture the conceptual richness of the words as they functioned when originally uttered, nor for that matter nonlinguistic, sensorimotor experiences that undoubtedly shape meaning (Binder et al., 2016; Frisby, Halai, Cox, Lambon Ralph, & Rogers, 2022), they do allow insight into the semantic relatedness between utterances that are not restricted to strict lexical overlap. But it is important to keep in mind that this semantic relatedness is ultimately that which exists in a high‐dimensional vector space derived from pre‐existing text (in the case of our use of word2vec, billions of words from Google News).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the selection of a regularization function amounts to a prior hypothesis stipulating how the neural signal is likely to be structured. As recently argued in (Frisby et al, 2023), the choice of regularizer should be informed by explicit hypotheses about the nature of the signal to be decoded-in this case, a hypothesis about how neurophysiological signals measured by surface electrodes in the brain might encode a graded, multi-variate semantic space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet direct empirical tests of this proposal—representational similarity analysis (RSA) of functional imaging data collected while people perform semantic tasks on words or pictures—have not generally tended to support it. A recent review identifies 24 studies applying RSA to uncover semantic representations in the brain (Frisby et al, 2023); of these, 18 (75%) failed to identify semantic structure in the anterior temporal cortex (for the exceptions, see Bruffaerts et al, 2013; Devereux et al, 2018; Fairhall & Caramazza, 2013; Martin et al, 2018; Peelen & Caramazza, 2012). Many of these studies instead find that semantic structure is encoded in brain areas not otherwise thought to be critical to semantic representation, including posterior cortical regions (Connolly et al, 2012), inferior and superior frontal and motor cortex (Carota et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2017), the left pars triangularis (Liuzzi et al, 2017), right superior parietal cortex (Wang et al, 2017), the insula and occipeto-parietal cortex (Kivisaari et al, 2019), and the posterior cingulate cortex (Fairhall & Caramazza, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of the transition from visual representations of individual objects to more abstract semantic-type concepts is determined by identifying the time points at which the category of the object can be accurately predicted from the multivariate representation in the MEG and EEG data (Proklova et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2017). However, drawing meaningful conclusions from the above-chance classification using stimuli from a single modality may be limited, as there are often multiple dimensions in which the two conditions differ (Peelen and Downing, 2022;Frisby et al, 2023). For example, one can argue that perceptual information beyond semantic content influences classification outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%