2006
DOI: 10.1002/spe.741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding prefix codes

Abstract: Minimum‐redundancy prefix codes have been a mainstay of research and commercial compression systems since their discovery by David Huffman more than 50 years ago. In this experimental evaluation we compare techniques for decoding minimum‐redundancy codes, and quantify the relative benefits of recently developed restricted codes that are designed to accelerate the decoding process. We find that table‐based decoding techniques offer fast operation, provided that the size of the table is kept relatively small, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, alphabets with more than 300.000 symbols are cited in , for which up to 32 levels would be needed. Whereas we do not have access to those data sets, some tests have been carried out assuming a Gaussian distribution of probabilities for 300‐K symbols.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, alphabets with more than 300.000 symbols are cited in , for which up to 32 levels would be needed. Whereas we do not have access to those data sets, some tests have been carried out assuming a Gaussian distribution of probabilities for 300‐K symbols.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , the test data sets proposed in the context of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) are presented. In , alphabets from those sets, with more than 300,000 unique symbols, are considered from the point of view of the decoder.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liddell and Moffat surveyed and evaluated techniques to speed up decoding of prefix codes . They report on a multiple‐codeword and multilevel lookup table.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The height of this conceptually infinite tree is capped by the bit-width of our lookup window. Because the resulting tree is not a canonical Huffman tree but a full binary tree, none of the above techniques apply.Liddell and Moffat surveyed and evaluated techniques to speed up decoding of prefix codes 27. They report on a multiple-codeword and multilevel lookuptable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having ruled out conventional entropy coders, we must consider alternatives. Variable‐length codes are generally inefficient to decode because of their bit‐level accesses, and even table‐based approaches are not much faster . We therefore turn to fixed‐length codes.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%