2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding oscillatory representations and mechanisms in memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they found that the combination of power and phase was better than either measure alone (Figure 1C), indicating a multiplexed coding scheme (discussed below). Together, these and other studies [30,31] confirm that content-specific representations can be decoded from aggregated neural activity.…”
Section: Independent Contributions Of Lfp Power and Phase To Neural Rsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, they found that the combination of power and phase was better than either measure alone (Figure 1C), indicating a multiplexed coding scheme (discussed below). Together, these and other studies [30,31] confirm that content-specific representations can be decoded from aggregated neural activity.…”
Section: Independent Contributions Of Lfp Power and Phase To Neural Rsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, we sought to replicate the important features of the Lewis-Peacock et al (2012) study while assaying neural activity with EEG, a technique sensitive to neural oscillations. This study was also notable for its attempt to decode stimulus information from delay-period oscillatory neural activity, a challenging design which is only slowly being adopted (for a recent review, see Jafarpour et al, 2013). The classifiers used in this study were trained and tested on frequency-transformed EEG data, allowing us to assay the information present in patterns of oscillatory signals.…”
Section: Neural Activation and Representational States In Short-term mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offline, the data were downsampled to 512 Hz, and divided into epochs of 4 s, from -1.5 to 2.5 s relative to both the onset of the word cue and target image in the study phase and relative to the word cue in the test phase. The data were transformed to a linked-mastoid reference, and a baseline correction was applied (subtraction by the average amplitude of the epoch; as in Jafarpour et al, 2013, 2014). Bipolar EOG was computed using the FP1 and the electrodes placed vertically and horizontally around the eyes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for each classifier, there were 6510 possible features (31 channels × 42 frequencies × five time points). No additional baseline correction was performed on the TFR and instead the power at each timepoint, frequency, and channel was normalized across trials (as in Jafarpour et al, 2013, 2014). Each classification used a ten-fold cross validation, that is, the data were randomized and partitioned into ten rough equal-sized subsets, over which ten training-test iterations were performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%