2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1058-11.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding Effector-Dependent and Effector-Independent Movement Intentions from Human Parieto-Frontal Brain Activity

Abstract: Our present understanding of the neural mechanisms and sensorimotor transformations that govern the planning of arm and eye movements predominantly come from invasive parieto-frontal neural recordings in nonhuman primates. While functional MRI (fMRI) has motivated investigations on much of these same issues in humans, the highly distributed and multiplexed organization of parietofrontal neurons necessarily constrain the types of intention-related signals that can be detected with traditional fMRI analysis tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
171
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
27
171
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in keeping with the known neurophysiological functions of the posterior parietal cortex and its role in supporting the body-schema representation (Head and Holmes, 1911;Kammers et al, 2009) and the planning of manual actions (Culham and Valyear, 2006;Gallivan et al, 2011). Neurons in area 5 of the macaque brain encode the hand position by integrating visual and proprioceptive signals (Graziano et al, 2000;Graziano and Botvinick, 2002).…”
Section: Dynamic Remapping Of the Hand-centered Representation Of Spacesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This is in keeping with the known neurophysiological functions of the posterior parietal cortex and its role in supporting the body-schema representation (Head and Holmes, 1911;Kammers et al, 2009) and the planning of manual actions (Culham and Valyear, 2006;Gallivan et al, 2011). Neurons in area 5 of the macaque brain encode the hand position by integrating visual and proprioceptive signals (Graziano et al, 2000;Graziano and Botvinick, 2002).…”
Section: Dynamic Remapping Of the Hand-centered Representation Of Spacesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our results thus speak in favor of a stronger effector-and weaker target-specificity in PMd compared with PCu in the human brain. Although earlier studies on reach planning indicated that PMd is primarily modulated by the effector hand (Beurze et al 2007;Medendorp et al 2005) more recent work using multivariate decoding approaches on fMRI data also demonstrated target-selectivity in PMd (Gallivan et al 2011;Fabbri et al 2014). …”
Section: Movement Goal Vs Visual Cue Representation In Specified Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are easily dissociated from an observed action such as biological factors, e.g. age or gender, or motor aspects such as posture; but other more cognitive properties, such as intention or determination are more difficult to dissociate from the observed action, and are actually often attributed to the observed action (Gallivan et al, 2011;Palmer et al, 2016). Another extrinsic factor is the target of the action, which can be an object, a point in space, or a conspecific, depending on the action class.…”
Section: Defining Action Observation: Intrinsic Aspects and Extrinsicmentioning
confidence: 99%