2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-008-9151-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding Deficits of Different Types of Batterers During Presentation of Facial Affect Slides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
66
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results lead us to believe that the deficit could be in emotional stimuli decoding, especially in those stimuli with a neutral value. In this sense, a previous study suggested that a significant percentage of IPV perpetrators may have these deficits (Babcock et al, 2008). IPV perpetrators may misunderstand and attribute hostile connotations to neutral stimuli and this increases the likelihood of behaving aggressively (Holtzworth-Munroe & Smutzler, 1996) if they believe that their partners maligned or blamed them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results lead us to believe that the deficit could be in emotional stimuli decoding, especially in those stimuli with a neutral value. In this sense, a previous study suggested that a significant percentage of IPV perpetrators may have these deficits (Babcock et al, 2008). IPV perpetrators may misunderstand and attribute hostile connotations to neutral stimuli and this increases the likelihood of behaving aggressively (Holtzworth-Munroe & Smutzler, 1996) if they believe that their partners maligned or blamed them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There may be some deficits whose interaction with hormonal parameters such as T may either facilitate or inhibit violent behavior. When comparing IPV perpetrators with nonviolent males, the IPV perpetrator group was more likely to misidentify signals given by their partners and react in a hostile and/or violent manner (Babcock, Green, & Webb, 2008). These detection errors were restricted to neutral and dislike facial expressions that were usually interpreted as hostile signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, one study reported that IPV perpetrators are less able to recognize standardized neutral and disgust facial expressions than non-violent men, although they did not differ in interpreting other facial expressions conveying, for example, sadness, anger, fear, happiness, and surprise (Babcock, Green, & Webb, 2008), suggesting that IPV perpetrators may present deficits in recognizing their wives' or partners' emotions, thus increasing the risk of violent reactions. In a similar line, another study demonstrated that IPV perpetrators with diminished sensitivity to their wives' or partners' expressions of fear presented a high risk of perpetrating IPV (Marshall & Holtzworth-Munroe, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%