2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.642251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding Covert Speech From EEG-A Comprehensive Review

Abstract: Over the past decade, many researchers have come up with different implementations of systems for decoding covert or imagined speech from EEG (electroencephalogram). They differ from each other in several aspects, from data acquisition to machine learning algorithms, due to which, a comparison between different implementations is often difficult. This review article puts together all the relevant works published in the last decade on decoding imagined speech from EEG into a single framework. Every important as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
(337 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The syntactic category of the stimulus was discriminable only by looking at the significant connections, showing the importance of restricting the topology analysis on the few significant connections. In recent years, there have been important technological and methodological advancements in perceived and imagined speech decoding (Martin et al, 2018;Panachakel & Ramakrishnan, 2021). Recent works focus on the classification of vowels (M. S. Mahmud et al, 2020; N. T. Duc & B. Lee, 2020), syllables (Archila-Meléndez et al, 2018;Brandmeyer et al, 2013;Correia et al, 2015), words (Ossmy et al, 2015;Proix et al, 2022;Vorontsova et al, 2021) and complete sentences (Chakrabarti et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2012), distinguishing stimuli mainly at the semantic level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The syntactic category of the stimulus was discriminable only by looking at the significant connections, showing the importance of restricting the topology analysis on the few significant connections. In recent years, there have been important technological and methodological advancements in perceived and imagined speech decoding (Martin et al, 2018;Panachakel & Ramakrishnan, 2021). Recent works focus on the classification of vowels (M. S. Mahmud et al, 2020; N. T. Duc & B. Lee, 2020), syllables (Archila-Meléndez et al, 2018;Brandmeyer et al, 2013;Correia et al, 2015), words (Ossmy et al, 2015;Proix et al, 2022;Vorontsova et al, 2021) and complete sentences (Chakrabarti et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2012), distinguishing stimuli mainly at the semantic level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of imagined speech in EEG signals [3], there have been several works that intend to solve the decoding of imagined speech on brain signals [27]. Among these works there are research that aims to classify vowels [28,29,30,31], words related to directions [17,32,33,34,31], and words to answer yes/no questions [35,36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoding natural language from brain signals, on the other hand, remains a major challenge. We point out that previous approaches on brain-to-text and brain-to-speech decoding (Herff et al 2015;Anumanchipalli, Chartier, and Chang 2019;Makin, Moses, and Chang 2020;Sun et al 2019;Panachakel and Ramakrishnan 2021;Nieto et al 2021;Moses et al 2021) still have limitations in terms of vocabulary size, device, and articulation dependency, etc. Previous work mainly focuses on achieving high accuracy, thus decodes sentences and words in small closed vocabularies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%