2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declining brachytherapy utilization for high-risk prostate cancer—Can clinical pathways reverse the trend?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 We recommend that both academic and nonacademic practices consider implementing changes to reverse this worrying trend. 42 Our findings also suggest that a focal boost (like that used in the FLAME trial) to the prostate can provide costeffective care, with an ICER of $62,607 per QALY gained. Interestingly, the focal boost was not cost effective relative to a brachytherapy boost, largely secondary to the increased cost of 35 fractions of EBRT compared with a single procedure of brachytherapy and 23 external-beam treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…41 We recommend that both academic and nonacademic practices consider implementing changes to reverse this worrying trend. 42 Our findings also suggest that a focal boost (like that used in the FLAME trial) to the prostate can provide costeffective care, with an ICER of $62,607 per QALY gained. Interestingly, the focal boost was not cost effective relative to a brachytherapy boost, largely secondary to the increased cost of 35 fractions of EBRT compared with a single procedure of brachytherapy and 23 external-beam treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A National Cancer Database analysis demonstrated that brachytherapy use had declined in both academic and nonacademic practices, raising concerns regarding sufficient brachytherapy training opportunities for trainees 41 . We recommend that both academic and nonacademic practices consider implementing changes to reverse this worrying trend 42 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…published in 2010 that there were virtually the same amount of brachytherapy centres in 2002 compared to 2010 and probably the same could be applied here while there is a decreasing trend in other countries [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, brachytherapy can be considered in every localized prostate cancer as it provides excellent biochemical control, with encouraging results in terms of metastatic-free-survival or overall survival [8][9][10][11][12]. Despite this fact, there is a decreasing trend of using prostate brachytherapy, as it requires, a multi-disciplinary team for optimal organization, including operating theatre and anaesthesiology and technical education for a good operator skill [13][14][15]. Considering the incidence rate of prostate cancer to be 100/100 000 men in France and the possible 24% increase of prostate cancer by 2025, it can be argued that the number of patients to be treated for prostate cancer in 2025 can be ranged between 15 000 and 20 000 per year [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel capability may be of particular meaning to brachytherapy. In fact, brachytherapy utilization has experienced a downward trend despite its demonstrated clinical benefits (Ling et al 2018, Schad et al 2020. While the causes are multifactorial, technical burden associated with brachytherapy for accurate, efficient, and safe treatments may be one major factor.…”
Section: Thoughts On Deep Learning In Brachytherapymentioning
confidence: 99%