2019
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declining abundance of beetles, moths and caddisflies in the Netherlands

Abstract: Recently, reports of insect declines prompted concerns with respect to the state of insects at a global level. Here, we present the results of longer‐term insect monitoring from two locations in the Netherlands: nature development area De Kaaistoep and nature reserves near Wijster. Based on data from insects attracted to light in De Kaaistoep, macro‐moths (macro‐Lepidoptera), beetles (Coleoptera), and caddisflies (Trichoptera) have declined in the mean number of individuals counted per evening over the period … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
103
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
103
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From first principles, very large local declines in aggregate measures of insect abundance, and to a certain extent biomass (e.g. Hallmann et al ., , ), must be driven predominantly by changes in the abundance of common, rather than rare species (Shortall et al ., ). Thus, statistical support for the local decline in abundance of common species is unlikely to correspond directly to a decline in range‐wide occupancy or increased risk of extinction (barring a few celebrated examples, such as the extinction of the super‐abundant Rocky Mountain locust Melanoplus spretus Walsh, 1866, Orthoptera: Acrididae, Lockwood, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From first principles, very large local declines in aggregate measures of insect abundance, and to a certain extent biomass (e.g. Hallmann et al ., , ), must be driven predominantly by changes in the abundance of common, rather than rare species (Shortall et al ., ). Thus, statistical support for the local decline in abundance of common species is unlikely to correspond directly to a decline in range‐wide occupancy or increased risk of extinction (barring a few celebrated examples, such as the extinction of the super‐abundant Rocky Mountain locust Melanoplus spretus Walsh, 1866, Orthoptera: Acrididae, Lockwood, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Germany, there has been a 75% decline in total flying insect biomass since 1989 (Hallman et al, 2017), while reductions of ca. 61% for macro moths and at least 42% for ground beetles were observed in the Netherlands from 1985 to 2006 (Hallmann et al, 2019). In England, a 58% reduction in the total abundance of 17 widespread butterfly species was recorded from 1984 to 2012 (Gilburn et al, 2015), while in southern Britain, long-term declines in flying insect abundance (particularly for Diptera) have been recorded (Shortall et al, 2009), with changing agricultural practices being a probable factor in the declines (but see McGregor et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in those groups showing declines, not all species were affected equally. Moth species associated with grass or herb host plants were more severely affected, as were ground beetle species that were closely associated with xerophytic habitats (Hallmann et al ., ). This would tend to suggest that land‐use and land management changes were important drivers of population trends, but causal mechanisms could not be specifically identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the Netherlands, Hallmann et al . () monitored populations of a number of different terrestrial and aquatic insect taxa using light trapping and pitfall trapping at up to 48 sites over time series of up to 26 years and detected declines in abundance and biomass (of up to 40–60%) for moths, beetles and caddisflies, while true bugs, mayflies and lacewings did not exhibit similar changes. Even in those groups showing declines, not all species were affected equally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%