2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declared and real physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and Caltrac accelerometer monitor: A potential tool for physical activity assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have also indicated that the results of the analysis of the physical activity level in the younger age group up to 15 years of age should be treated with the utmost caution. They also recommended the use of an objective measuring method such as an accelerometer, which is increasingly more often applied in the recent years in youth research [19,20,21,22,23,24,25].…”
Section: Methods and Research Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have also indicated that the results of the analysis of the physical activity level in the younger age group up to 15 years of age should be treated with the utmost caution. They also recommended the use of an objective measuring method such as an accelerometer, which is increasingly more often applied in the recent years in youth research [19,20,21,22,23,24,25].…”
Section: Methods and Research Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the IPAQ questionnaire and Caltrac accelerometer among 31 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Their results showed, that the questionnaire study does allow the assessment of physical activity and is equivalent to direct methods [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of self-reported PA is that participants tend to overestimate their PA amounts and intensity and often as a consequence are misclassified as meeting recommended PA guidelines [15,16,17,18,19]. Considering this limitation, some studies have shown moderate agreement between subjective and objective measurement methods of PA [20,21,22,23]. Furthermore, this study was not concerned with the assessment of participant PA amounts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%