Declarations of Promiscuity: “Housing,” Autonomy, and Urban Female Friendship in Uganda

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between "sugar daddyism" and emerging forms of female sociality among young, educated women in urban Uganda. In particular, I demonstrate how the practice of "housing"-wherein one man sponsors an outing for multiple women-fosters new spaces for female friendship. Scholars of African social relations have long noted the centrality of material exchange in establishing and maintaining ties of kinship and political patronage; more recently, the interplay between capital and sentiment in sexual relationships has garnered significant attention. Yet friendship, in Africa and elsewhere, remains remarkably undertheorized. Profound generational shifts in sociality, shaped by rural-urban migration, the expansion of higher education, and the influx of Western media, make Uganda a fertile site for the study of new forms of non-kin affiliation. In this article, I analyze the relations of exchange that simultaneously constitute sugar daddyism and female peer relationships in order to make three major points. First, although sugar daddyism functions according to logics of asymmetrical exchange, such relationships animate horizontal reciprocity within female peer groups. Second, educated young women discursively construct friendship as a space for "fun," in opposition to romantic and kin relationships. Third, these peer networks allow female students to cultivate felt freedom according to a logic of independence through multiple dependencies. This article is based on two years of ethnographic fieldwork with female students at Makerere University in Uganda's capital, Kampala, from 2010

“How to Live a Good Life”

“…Finally, some refugee girls resort to transactional sex in a local and regional context in which the latter is a common livelihoods strategy, not only for the displaced and the poor but also for middle-class women. In Uganda, transactional sex is found across all social classes and can involve partners of similar age or with huge age gaps (Bocast 2017). Economic and aff ective considerations are oft en intertwined, and there is a wide spectrum between transactional encounters as part of normal courtship (Nyanzi et al 2001;cf.…”

Morality in the middle: choosing cars or houses in Botswana

“…While anthropologists have noted that middle-income, middle-class people in Africa often continue to distribute to a range of relatives (see Lentz 2020), it is also notable how a new material plenty allows more intensive friendship work (see, for example, Bocast 2017; Moore 2018). Houses house not only nieces and nephews needing places to stay while at school or looking for work, but also many friends from childhood, schools, or even work.…”

Wealth in people and the value of historic Oberlin Cemetery, Raleigh, North Carolina

“…A final noteworthy expansion of the wealth in people model is its applicability to small‐scale and diffuse distributions of power, such as those in individual patron–client relations (Allan , 241–42; Bocast ; Croucher ) and the more collective or mutualistic strategies of leaders who must attract and maintain followers (Richard , 202; Robertshaw ). Such treatments help wealth in people apply to more than a narrow set of actors whom we might call the “wealthiest in people”—the formidable chiefs and mythological heroes best able to amass and mobilize wealth.…”