Abstract:While surgery for ASD is beneficial and results in functional improvement, in over 20% of older adults outcomes from surgery are less desirable. 80% of patients agreed that having surgery was the right decision for them, 77% would make the same choice in future, and 21% regretted their choice.
“…The authors likewise reported that decisional regret is a relatively common finding among surgical patients, citing a range of 2% to 40%. 5,13,14 However, most of these studies constituted surgeries for oncologic pathology. We herein illustrate that postoperative decisional regret among patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative conditions is at the lower end of this spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also concluded that patients with higher regret exhibited a greater prevalence of depression and anxiety. 5 To the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated decisional regret in patients with degenerative spine conditions. Thus, the present study aimed to explore how patients retrospectively viewed their decision to pursue spine surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology and evaluate factors correlated with decisional regret among this patient population.…”
Cross-sectional survey and retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective. To explore how patients perceive their decision to pursue spine surgery for degenerative conditions and evaluate factors correlated with decisional regret. Summary of Background Data. Prior research shows that onein-five older adults regret their decision to undergo spinal deformity surgery. However, no studies have investigated decisional regret in patients with degenerative conditions. Methods. Patients who underwent cervical or lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions (decompression, fusion, or disk replacement) between April 2017 and December 2020 were included. The Ottawa Decisional Regret Questionnaire was implemented to assess prevalence of decisional regret. Questionnaire scores were used to categorize patients into low (< 40) or medium/high ( ≥ 40) decisional regret cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back/Leg/Arm, and Neck Disability
“…The authors likewise reported that decisional regret is a relatively common finding among surgical patients, citing a range of 2% to 40%. 5,13,14 However, most of these studies constituted surgeries for oncologic pathology. We herein illustrate that postoperative decisional regret among patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative conditions is at the lower end of this spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also concluded that patients with higher regret exhibited a greater prevalence of depression and anxiety. 5 To the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated decisional regret in patients with degenerative spine conditions. Thus, the present study aimed to explore how patients retrospectively viewed their decision to pursue spine surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology and evaluate factors correlated with decisional regret among this patient population.…”
Cross-sectional survey and retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective. To explore how patients perceive their decision to pursue spine surgery for degenerative conditions and evaluate factors correlated with decisional regret. Summary of Background Data. Prior research shows that onein-five older adults regret their decision to undergo spinal deformity surgery. However, no studies have investigated decisional regret in patients with degenerative conditions. Methods. Patients who underwent cervical or lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions (decompression, fusion, or disk replacement) between April 2017 and December 2020 were included. The Ottawa Decisional Regret Questionnaire was implemented to assess prevalence of decisional regret. Questionnaire scores were used to categorize patients into low (< 40) or medium/high ( ≥ 40) decisional regret cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back/Leg/Arm, and Neck Disability
“…Although these conferences require structured collaboration between multiple care providers, their applicability and utility are within reach in many institutions and have been reproduced in the literature. 20 Recent evidence has shown that 20% of patients who undergo spinal deformity surgery may regret their decision, 21 perhaps secondary to unrealistic expectations of surgery and its outcomes. 22 Sikora et al 22 demonstrated that only 17% of patients presenting for spine deformity surgery in a high-volume institution had an absence of a psychiatric comorbidity and expectations of surgery that were felt to be "realistic" by the surgical team based on typical outcomes presented to patients during a shared decision-making process.…”
Personalized medicine has made a tremendous impact on patient care. Although initially, it revolutionized pharmaceutical development and targeted therapies in oncology, it has also made an important impact in orthopaedic surgery. The field of spine surgery highlights the effect of personalized medicine because the improved understanding of spinal pathologies and technological innovations has made personalized medicine a key component of patient care. There is evidence for several of these advancements to support their usage in improving patient care. Proper understanding of normative spinal alignment and surgical planning software has enabled surgeons to predict postoperative alignment accurately. Furthermore, 3D printing technologies have demonstrated the ability to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with free-hand techniques. Patient-specific, precontoured rods have shown improved biomechanical properties, which reduces the risk of postoperative rod fractures. Moreover, approaches such as multidisciplinary evaluations tailored to specific patient needs have demonstrated the ability to decrease complications. Personalized medicine has shown the ability to improve care in all phases of surgical management, and several of these approaches are now readily available to orthopaedic surgeons.
“…This study from Houston (Texas, USA) investigated whether patients who underwent such surgery were satisfied with their outcomes, and whether they would make the same decision to proceed with surgery again. 2 This is a useful study to help inform decisions in a very difficult area. For the purposes of this study, 155 patients, with a mean age of 69.5 years, underwent spinal surgery in a large quaternary centre.…”
Section: Decisional Regret Among Older Adults Undergoing Corrective S...mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.