2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-017-9681-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decisional Procrastination: Assessing Characterological and Contextual Variables around Indecision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured indecision using the five-item decisional Procrastination scale developed by Mann (1982) and reported by Ferrari, Johnson, and McCown (1995). Decisional procrastination is a stable, maladaptive pattern of postponing decisions, especially when choices involve conflict (Janis & Mann, 1977) or require cognitive effort (Ferrari & Pychyl, 2007; Ferrari, Crum, & Pardo, 2018). Responses were given on a 5-point scale, ranging from “false for me” (1) to “true for me” (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured indecision using the five-item decisional Procrastination scale developed by Mann (1982) and reported by Ferrari, Johnson, and McCown (1995). Decisional procrastination is a stable, maladaptive pattern of postponing decisions, especially when choices involve conflict (Janis & Mann, 1977) or require cognitive effort (Ferrari & Pychyl, 2007; Ferrari, Crum, & Pardo, 2018). Responses were given on a 5-point scale, ranging from “false for me” (1) to “true for me” (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work hypothesized that self-regulation strategies and processes, such as decision making, goal setting, and learning from mistakes, could be expected to counteract adverse procrastination tendencies in young adults to some extent, by counteracting decisional procrastination over and above the effects of personal trait-level differences, such as perseverance, which were also considered. Even though decisional procrastination has been linked with personal aspects of character (rather than context), explanations have also included aspects like the need for cognition and excessive (metacognitive) clutter, that distracts from decision making (Ferrari et al, 2018). In this regard, self-regulated learning strategies have been found to play critical mediation roles between people's beliefs about procrastination and decisional procrastination (De Palo et al, 2017), suggesting that, even if not the root of the problem, self-regulation strategiesespecially time management -may be key in fostering its prevention.…”
Section: Full Structural Equation Model For Self-regulation and Pure mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the two main traditions of research, that is, as a stable personality trait or as a behavior closely linked to the characteristics of a given situation [12], procrastination was investigated from five perspectives, including: 1. general procrastination, referring to a dysfunctional behavior negatively associated with health, wealth, and happiness [13] as well as to difficulty in meeting deadlines within a specific time-frame; 2. academic procrastination, considered as a pervasive and permanent desire on the part of the learner to postpone academic activities, such as deferring study the night just before the exam-this form of procrastination is usually accompanied by anxiety [14,15]; 3. decisional procrastination, related to a stable maladaptive pattern of postponing a decision when faced with conflicts and choices [16,17]; 4. neurotic procrastination, referring to difficulties with building critical judgments and making well-timed life decisions [18]; 5. compulsive or dysfunctional procrastination, referring to the coexistence of both decisional and behavioral procrastination [19], where the latter is related to failing task completion, feeling guilty after a positive event, and choosing handicapping situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%