Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096) 1999
DOI: 10.1109/dcc.1999.755688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision trees for error concealment in video decoding

Abstract: When macroblocks are lost in a video decoder such as MPEG-2, the decoder can try to conceal the error by estimating or interpolating the missing area. Many different methods for this type of post-processing concealment have been proposed, operating in the spatial, frequency, or temporal domains, or some hybrid combination of them. In this paper, we show how the use of a decision tree that can adaptively choose among several different error concealment methods can outperform each single method. We also propose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One significant conclusion is that the decision tree approach gives a performance advantage over not using it, even when the tree is not customized for the particular sequence, but rather is constructed from unrelated sequences. This is in contrast to the work reported in [8] where a CART decision tree (for a single frame codec) was used to choose among spatial, temporal, and frequency concealment, and it was found that performance gains could be had only by a customized tree. Because it required a customized tree, that system required side information and could not be standard compliant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One significant conclusion is that the decision tree approach gives a performance advantage over not using it, even when the tree is not customized for the particular sequence, but rather is constructed from unrelated sequences. This is in contrast to the work reported in [8] where a CART decision tree (for a single frame codec) was used to choose among spatial, temporal, and frequency concealment, and it was found that performance gains could be had only by a customized tree. Because it required a customized tree, that system required side information and could not be standard compliant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…A further level of adaptivity appears in [6] and [7]. In [8], a CART decision tree is used to decide upon a particular EC approach among several EC algorithms.…”
Section: Prior Work On Error Concealmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of mode selection on the quality of the resulting video should not be underestimated [7], since spatial and temporal concealment provide quite different visual quality and PSNR. If the MVs can be estimated with a satisfactory degree of accuracy, temporal concealment usually yields better results, since the replacement MB is sharp and fairly similar to the original.…”
Section: Introduction and State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 8 methods listed in Table 1, none is consistently best for all MBs. In our previous work [2], the EC method is chosen by a decision tree which looks at the context of the missing MB. The tree is designed at the encoder using the CARTTM algorithm [ 11, and is transmitted to the decoder.…”
Section: Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%