2016
DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2016.1233776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-support tool for management of miombo woodlands: a matrix model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the distribution of land management zone regimes and specific tree species growing in each zone have not been described [98]. The development of a matrix model will help promote better decisions in the management of miombo [119,120]. The finding of our studies suggest that models should focus on the development of management approaches tailored to each management zone (open or closed miombo) based on actual tree species presence, abundances, and its importance to local communities.…”
Section: Description Of the Structure For Management Planning Zonesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the distribution of land management zone regimes and specific tree species growing in each zone have not been described [98]. The development of a matrix model will help promote better decisions in the management of miombo [119,120]. The finding of our studies suggest that models should focus on the development of management approaches tailored to each management zone (open or closed miombo) based on actual tree species presence, abundances, and its importance to local communities.…”
Section: Description Of the Structure For Management Planning Zonesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The number of tree and shrub species (88) encountered in the stands was fewer than some other studies in miombo ecosystems have been reported Giliba et al (2011) and Mugasha et al (2016), yet it was within the range of observed elsewhere in the miombo ecosystem (Isango et al, 2007;Kamangadazi, 2019;Mwakalukwa et al, 2014). The species composition did not change much during the study period, but some species seemed to contribute more than others in the process of recolonization of empty spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Additionally, some up growth from saplings into trees at the threshold of 5 cm in diameter was also involved but with a minimal effect only. This is a typical miombo characteristic where a high density of coppice, root suckers, and seedlings are produced annually; but very few manage to grow to maturity (Chamshama et al, 2004;Mugasha et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all harvesting alternatives, "no harvesting" resulted in the largest basal area (18.7 m 2 ha -1 ), net volume growth (83 m 3 ha -1 ), and stem biomass (49 t C ha -1 ) in 99 years, which was dominated by species group 1 because of bigger diameter trees compared to other groups. Generally, simulation of stand dynamics under harvesting alternatives with "varying intensity" and "uniform intensity" tends to arrive at relatively similar steady-state stand conditions in terms of density, basal area, volume, and accumulation of above-ground biomass carbon after 99 years (Hofstad et al 2015, Mugasha et al 2016. Despite the relative similarities in the stand attributes achieved through the applied harvesting alternatives, the use of "varying intensity" harvesting can be considered ecologically friendly for wood production through stand density, volume growth, and biomass accumulation in miombo woodlands.…”
Section: Pathways For Maximizing Stand Growth Wood Production and Ecological Recovery In Miombo Woodlands (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%