Decision Support System and Multi‐Criteria Decision Aid: A State of the Art and Perspectives

Razmak, Jamil; Aouni, Belaı̈d

doi:10.1002/mcda.1530

Cited by 44 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 106 publications

(138 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…MCDM methods can be difficult to compare and to check their accuracy because they use a variety of methods to deal with different sets of data [30]. Razmak and Aouni [31] said that specific MCDM methods can work better for specific problems. Haddad [12] described steps to attain an appropriate compromise result for a problem with multiple criteria: Problem Identification; Goal and Target Definition; Criteria Definition; Identification of the alternatives; MCDM method selection to evaluate alternatives with respect to criteria; and Reassess and reevaluate the outcomes.…”

Section: Decision Making and Promethee IImentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting a Best Compromise Direction for a Powered Wheelchair Using PROMETHEE

Haddad

Sanders

2019

IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research is described that determines the direction that a powered wheelchair will take, using the Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II). This is the first time that this sort of decision making has been used in this type of application. A user suggests a desired direction and speed, and the decision-making system suggests a safe direction for a wheelchair. The two are mixed and the wheelchair then tends to avoid obstacles. The inputs come from a powered wheelchair joystick and two ultrasonic transducers fixed onto the wheelchair and the final direction is a mix of the desired direction and a direction that moves the wheelchair away from obstacles. The arrangement assists a disabled driver to steer their wheelchairs. It uses a systematic decision-making process and this paper presents the process and a new way of selecting a best compromise direction. Sensitivity analysis is employed to explore potentially suitable directions as uncertainty and risk may be present. A suitable direction is selected that provides a robust solution. The user is able to override the suggestions by the PROMETHEE II system by holding the joystick in a position.

show abstract

Section: Decision Making and Promethee IImentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting a Best Compromise Direction for a Powered Wheelchair Using PROMETHEE

Haddad

Sanders

2019

IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pengambilan keputusan dalam penetapan perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik analisis MCDM (Multiple Criteria Decision Making), hal ini dilakukan karena dalam perhitungan dan analisisnya melibatkan beberapa aspek dengan berbagai kriteria/atribut. Razmak and Aouni (2015) menemukan bahwa lebih dari 100 tulisan selama 20 tahun terakhir menggunakan MCDSS (Multiple-Criteria Decision Support System) sebagai alat pengambil keputusan. MCDM dapat didefiniskan sebagai suatu teknik analisis yang melibatkan suatu prosedur penyusunan berbagai kriteria untuk membantu pengambilan keputusan (DM) dalam memilih alternatif 'terbaik' dari sejumlah pilihan-alternatif yang mungkin, berdasarkan tujuan dan sasaran tertentu (Baja, 2012b).…”

Section: Teknik Analisis Dalam Pengambilan Keputusanunclassified

Identifikasi Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Gowa, Sulawesi Selatan: Zonasi Lingkup Kawasan Mamminasata Menggunakan Pendekatan MCDM

Chairuddin¹

2018

JES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The protection of agricultural land is very important to be studied scientifically considering the rapid growth of the population so that the possibility of land use conflict is very high. The main purpose of this research is to identify and inventory agricultural land of food especially existing rice-paddy fields to find zonasi agricultural land for sustainable foodcrops (ALSF) and agricultural reserved land for sustainable foodcrops (ARLSF)) with the level of threat from the transfer function in Gowa Regency area of hinterland Mamminasata, South Sulawesi. This study used a multiple criteria decision making approach with purpose mapping function of ALSF and ARLSF. The generic attributes, from: the biophysical aspects of the land (altitude, sizes of soil cracking, length of rice-field in slope landscape unit, proportion of paddy field area, top soil thickness), and socio-economic aspects (population density, population growth rate, demand for paddy field, productivity of paddy fields, equilibrium of paddy field), and policy aspects (local regulations status, detailed spatial plan status, type of irrigation networks). While the scenario of zonation of ALSF and ARLSF is used the criteria of distance from the provincial capital (Makassar) and the district capital (Sombaopu), the status of the rice-paddy field equilibrium and the trend pattern of percentage of space requirement.The results of the research shows that the existing position of paddy field is identified as ALSF and ARLSF zonation currently 24,210 Ha. The level of vulnerability of land conversion, which is in a "safe" position of 15,407 Ha (63.64%), and "threatened" of 8,803 Ha (36.36%). The prediction of productivity potential is related to the area of land that can be managed optimally in the vulnerable time up to the year 2020 covering 19,499 Ha (80.54%), and subsequently, by 2040 the area will shrink to only 10,173 Ha (42.02%).

show abstract

“…MDAMs do not present an ideal solution for a given problem but the most satisfactory possible solutions within the universe of adopted alternatives and conflicting objectives (Razmak and Aouni, 2015). For general information on the method, a paper (Montajabiha, 2015) and the chapter of the book by Brans and Mareschal (2005) that specifically discusses the PROMETHEE method were used as reference.…”

Section: Multi-criteria Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of sustainable electric energy generation technologies using a multi-criteria decision methodology

Dester

Francato

2018

IJETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main purpose of this study is to determine the technological options for electricity production based on available electric energy sources in Brazil. The results from this study can be used as a reference for the elaboration of guidelines and public policies that are needed to support plans for electric energy supply expansion. Furthermore, these results can provide input on the construction of energy mix that can meet Brazilian demands and help achieve sustainability in the generation expansion process. The study is based on a multi-criteria analysis methodology that ranks the best alternatives for electric energy production based on criteria linked to sustainability and environmental, technical and economic dimensions.Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Dester, M. and Francato, A.L. (2018) 'Comparative analysis of sustainable electric energy generation technologies using a multi-criteria decision methodology', Int.Biographical notes: Mauricio Dester works for Furnas Centrais Eletricas and he is a Professor in Anhanguera College of Campinas. He holds a PhD in Energy Systems Planning, an MSc in Electrical Engineering and BS in Electrical Engineering. Working for Furnas, a company with the core business of generation and transmission of electricity, he is the manager of the Sao Paulo Regional Operation Center, responsible for a very important part of the national interconnected power system of Brazil. His knowledge interest areas are in power systems (operation, planning, policy and regulation); training applied to power system operation; business and people management, especially related to control centres. Comparative analysis of sustainable electric energy generation technologies 65Alberto Luiz Francato is a Professor in the School of Civil Engineering, Department of Hydric Resources, State University of Campinas (FEC-UNICAMP); he is working in undergraduate courses in civil engineering and architecture. He is also teaching and guiding academic papers in graduate courses with following subjects: water resources, energy and environmental. He has served 20 years in the field of water and energy resources, highlighting the operational planning of hydro systems and analysis of water supply systems. He has also worked on research projects assisted by CNPq, FAPESP, CTNERG and R&D ANEEL. He was responsible for coordinating the undergraduate course in FEC-UNICAMP Civil Engineering from

show abstract

Decision Support System and Multi‐Criteria Decision Aid: A State of the Art and Perspectives

Cited by 44 publications

References 106 publications

Selecting a Best Compromise Direction for a Powered Wheelchair Using PROMETHEE

Selecting a Best Compromise Direction for a Powered Wheelchair Using PROMETHEE

Identifikasi Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Gowa, Sulawesi Selatan: Zonasi Lingkup Kawasan Mamminasata Menggunakan Pendekatan MCDM

Comparative analysis of sustainable electric energy generation technologies using a multi-criteria decision methodology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About