2016
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1268910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision points in the treatment of transfusional iron overload in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: why, when, and how to chelate

Abstract: Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) differ from those with other transfusion-dependent conditions (eg, thalassemia) as they are typically older, have comorbid conditions, and a generally shorter life expectancy. The underlying disease process in MDS and frequent use of red blood cell transfusions lead to iron accumulation and ultimately organ damage. Whether iron-reducing interventions such as chelation therapy can improve outcomes in this population is currently under investigation. Areas covered: W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 , 2 Because of chronic anemia, up to 80% of MDS patients become transfusion dependent. 3 Due to repeated blood transfusion and ineffective hematopoiesis, most MDS patients can eventually develop iron overload. Excessive iron can deposit in the liver, heart, spleen, pancreas, bone marrow (BM) and other tissues, resulting in tissue damage and fibrosis, and a series of complications which seriously affect the prognosis of MDS patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 2 Because of chronic anemia, up to 80% of MDS patients become transfusion dependent. 3 Due to repeated blood transfusion and ineffective hematopoiesis, most MDS patients can eventually develop iron overload. Excessive iron can deposit in the liver, heart, spleen, pancreas, bone marrow (BM) and other tissues, resulting in tissue damage and fibrosis, and a series of complications which seriously affect the prognosis of MDS patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting bias has frequently been observed in haematological studies and in clinical trials performed on MDS patients, 6,7 and comparison of treatment effectiveness is therefore challenging 8,9 . For the evaluation of evidence‐based treatment effectiveness, the validity of evidence syntheses is an essential factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%