2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision model and analysis for investment interest expense deduction and allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with Graham and Tucker (2006) who claims that debt and non-debt tax burden could substitute each other. The research of Lee, Deng, Lin, and Yang (2010) identified the optimal tax strategy for investors using mathematical analysis and modelling and showed that (for certain income structures) the tax savings by deducting one-dollar investment interest expense (subset of a debt) may be more than the tax rate on the dollar of investment income that is offset. Martinez and Ramalho (2014) pointed out the indicator of debt per assets as one of the key indicators to measure the tax aggressiveness of Brazilian firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with Graham and Tucker (2006) who claims that debt and non-debt tax burden could substitute each other. The research of Lee, Deng, Lin, and Yang (2010) identified the optimal tax strategy for investors using mathematical analysis and modelling and showed that (for certain income structures) the tax savings by deducting one-dollar investment interest expense (subset of a debt) may be more than the tax rate on the dollar of investment income that is offset. Martinez and Ramalho (2014) pointed out the indicator of debt per assets as one of the key indicators to measure the tax aggressiveness of Brazilian firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%