The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision methodology for the development of an expert system applied in an adaptable energy retrofit façade system for residential buildings

Abstract: a b s t r a c tA very large percentage of the European residential building stock is ageing and does not comply with current energy regulations. The need to complete short-term energy upgrading on these buildings in order to improve performance and meet current regulations poses a considerable challenge. Consistent energy methodologies are needed for mass application of suitable technologies in sensitive points such as the façade, saving time by guiding designers on use of preferred climatic design strategies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the variety of elements that can achieve energy savings, and different factors that influence final design such as budget and local regulations, careful consideration must be made by the design team early on about the most suitable combinations for the specific project. The selection process for retrofits with adaptable features requires a multi-variable evaluative procedure to select the best-performing combination of technologies for each situation, which requires knowledge of climatic systems and an integrated design-decision process (Hong et al 2015) that takes into account project priorities (Ochoa and Capeluto 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the variety of elements that can achieve energy savings, and different factors that influence final design such as budget and local regulations, careful consideration must be made by the design team early on about the most suitable combinations for the specific project. The selection process for retrofits with adaptable features requires a multi-variable evaluative procedure to select the best-performing combination of technologies for each situation, which requires knowledge of climatic systems and an integrated design-decision process (Hong et al 2015) that takes into account project priorities (Ochoa and Capeluto 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many decision support systems (DSS) for the refurbishment purposes have been developed worldwide: Kaklauskas et al (2015) proposed multiple criteria DSS of the life cycle of the built environment; Juan, Kim, Roper, and Castro-Lacouture (2009) Genetic algorithm-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies; Ochoa and Capeluto (2015) an adaptable energy retrofit façade system for residential buildings; Uzomah, Scholz, and Almuktar (2014) -an expert tool for different professions based on estimated ecosystem variables for retrofitting of drainage system; Di Sivo and Ladiana (2011) -decision-support tools for municipal infrastructure maintenance management, etc.…”
Section: Methodology For the Assessment Of Apartment Building Performmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line of Research Category: (Tovarović and Ivanović-Šekularac, Jelena Šekularac, 2017), (Berardi, 2016), (Pérez-Urrestarazu, Luis Fernández-Cañero, Rafael Franco-Salas and Egea, 2016), (Aste et al, 2015), (Saber et al, 2015), (Ascione et al, 2014 (Carlos, 2017), (Eliopoulou and Mantziou, 2017), (Biyanto et al, 2016), (Cuce, 2016), (Evola and Margani, 2016), (Hengstberger et al, 2016), (Si et al, 2016), (Giovanardi et al, 2015), (Monetti et al, 2015), (Smith Bioclimatic Control Integrated Passive, Active and Smart Technologies and Svendsen, 2015), (Capeluto and Ochoa, 2014), (Moran et al, 2014), (Häkkinen, 2012), (Halawa, 2009), (Hestnes and Kofoed, 2002), (Santamouris and Dascalaki, 2002) (Carbonaro et al, 2016), (Thomsen et al, 2016), (Li et al, 2013), (Ochoa and Capeluto, 2015), (Rovers, 2014), (Silva et al, 2013), (Xing et al, 2011), (Aouad et al, 2010)…”
Section: Concepts Detected Key Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Li et al, 2013) the economic and financial issues in deploying CO2 capture in the cement industry. (Ochoa and Capeluto, 2015) a methodology with integrative approach between energy and economic aspects. (Rovers, 2014) an application of standardized process in order to improve ER actions.…”
Section: Line Of Researc Hmentioning
confidence: 99%