Decision making tools for managing waiting times and treatment rates in elective surgery

Abstract

Background Waiting times for elective treatments, including elective surgery, are a source of public concern and therefore are on policy makers’ agenda. The long waiting times have often been tackled through the allocation of additional resources, in an attempt to reduce them, but results are not straightforward. At the same time, researchers have reported wide geographical variations in the provision of elective care not driven by patient needs or preferences but by other factors. The paper analyses the relationship between waiting times and treatment rates for nine high-volume elective surgical procedures in order to support decision making regarding the availability of these services for the citizens. Using the framework already proposed for the diagnostic services, we identify different patterns that can be followed to align the supply with patient needs in the Italian context. Methods After measuring the waiting times and the treatment rates for nine procedures in the 34 districts in Tuscany, we performed correlation analyses. Then, we plotted the results in a matrix cross-checking waiting times and rates. By doing so, we identified four different contexts that require a second step analysis to tackle unwarranted geographical variations and ensure timely care to patients. Finally, for each district and elective surgical procedure, we measured the economic impact of the different treatment rates in order to evaluate whether there are any supply criticalities and eventually some room for maneuver. We also included active and passive mobility of patients. Results The results show a high degree of variation both in treatment rates and waiting times, especially for the orthopaedic procedures: knee replacement, knee arthroscopy and hip replacement. The analysis performed for the nine interventions shows that the 34 districts are in varying positions in the waiting time-treatment rate matrix, suggesting that there is no straightforward relationship between rates and waiting times. Each combination in the matrix may have different determinants that require healthcare managers to adopt diversified strategies. The decision making process needs to be supported by a two-level analysis: the first one to put in place the matrix that cross-checks waiting times and treatment rates, the second one to analyse the characteristics of each quadrant and the improvement actions that can be proposed. Conclusions In Italy, waiting times in elective surgical services are a main policy issue with a relevant geographical variation. Our analysis reveals that this variation is due to multiple elements. In order to avoid simplistic approaches that do not solve the problem but often lead to increased expenditure, policy makers and healthcare managers should follow a two-step strategy firstly identifying the type of context and secondly analysing the impact of elements such as resource productivity, resource availability, pa...

Waiting times in emergency departments: a resource allocation or an efficiency issue?

“…This paper adapted the waiting times-admission rate matrix already used in other services [44][45] to the ED context, using the illustrative example of Tuscan EDs. The matrix can work as a logical diagnostic tool to help managers analyse the situation of their EDs.…”

“…To provide a diagnostic logical framework to detect the specific situation and the factors influencing ED waiting times, we propose a descriptive study based on a matrix that compares ED waiting times with the ED admission rate. This framework has been designed and applied to other services [44,45].…”

Implementing successful systematic Patient Reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROMs and PREMs) in robotic oncological surgery—The role of physicians

“…Given that Tuscany is the Italian region with the highest number of robotic surgical systems per capita (1 unit every 287 000 inhabitants against a national average of 1 unit every 600 000 inhabitants), the ongoing debate around the cost of robotic surgery and the persisting unwarranted variation for surgical services, the regional administration has decided to put in place a routine collection of patient reported measures for patients who suffer from prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer and receive a robotic procedure.…”

How many patients can each surgeon have on their waiting list and still treat them all in time?

“…[1][2][3][4] Long delays can enable symptoms to deteriorate, and frustrate patients, surgeons and supporting staff. [5,6] The effi-ciency of the scheduled care system is immensely important for hospital stakeholders as surgery is often the greatest cost and source of revenue for hospitals, at times accounting for up to 60%-70% of hospital admissions. [7] Extended waiting times for elective surgery can be caused by a mismatch between waiting list demand and capacity, result-ing from inefficient capacity planning, [8] or challenges with the chronological management of patient bookings (process issues).…”

“…[11] However, reducing demand even when taking into consideration clinical and non-clinical parameters, may raise ethical dilemmas [11] and various studies concluded that demand may not necessarily be the cause for long waiting times. [5] Interestingly, other studies have suggested that the lack of capacity is not the major issue and funding extra sessions may be a suboptimal approach from a financial perspective, [8] but rather the root cause of patients waiting longer than clinically recommended timeframes is a combination of demand and capacity variation in conjunction with ineffective capacity planning. [8] Hence, there is a need for a targeted demand and capacity monitor to enable risk escalations and more effective theatre allocations.…”