Decision-Making of Older Patients in Context of the Doctor-Patient Relationship: A Typology Ranging from “Self-Determined” to “Doctor-Trusting” Patients

Abstract

Background. This qualitative study aims to gain insight into the perceptions and experiences of older patients with regard to sharing health care decisions with their general practitioners. Patients and Methods. Thirty-four general practice patients (≥70 years) were asked about their preferences and experiences concerning shared decision making with their doctors using qualitative semistructured interviews. All interviews were analysed according to principles of content analysis. The resulting categories were then arranged into a classification grid to develop a typology of preferences for participating in decision-making processes. Results. Older patients generally preferred to make decisions concerning everyday life rather than medical decisions, which they preferred to leave to their doctors. We characterised eight different patient types based on four interdependent positions (self-determination, adherence, information seeking, and trust). Experiences of a good doctor-patient relationship were associated with trust, reliance on the doctor for information and decision making, and adherence. Conclusion. Owing to the varied patient decision-making types, it is not easy for doctors to anticipate the desired level of patient involvement. However, the decision matter and the self-determination of patients provide good starting points in preparing the ground for shared decision making. A good relationship with the doctor facilitates satisfying decision-making experiences.

Informed Consent Obtainment, Malpractice Litigation, and the Potential Role of Shared Decision-making Approaches

“…The reprieuropean Journal of health law 24 (2016) 1-21 mand proportion was about 59% (135 lawsuits). It is remarkable that almost one third thereof concerned failures to appropriately document the process of IC obtainment (42). It appeared that cases on failed documentation often concerned the information provision (rather than consent achievement).…”

Physicians' perceptions of shared decision‐making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice

“…During SDM, clinicians and patients share information about the decision, discuss patients' preferences for different available options and collaborate to reach a decision . The majority of patients desire some involvement in their health decisions . Even when patients prefer that clinicians make the final decision, nearly all patients want to be provided with accurate information about treatment options and asked about their preferences …”

MeViTa: Interactive Visualizations to Help Older Adults with Their Medication Intake Using a Camera-Projector System

“…Furthermore, the name of Julie was always mentioned as a reminder and colors were used to refer to medication. Like Wrede-Sach et al [50], we also learned older adults place a lot of trust in their GP. Some participants were not willing to read an unknown leaflet as their doctor told them not to read their leaflets.…”