2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-017-0499-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision making model to predict presence of coronary artery disease using neural network and C5.0 decision tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the attributes generated in the dimensional reduction process, when referring to the costing groupings of Feshki and Shijani's [2] research results, there are two costly checks, namely scintigraphy and fluoroscopy. A similar result is also made by Ahmadi et.al [3], a combination model of C5.0 with a neural network, which does not reduce both the costly attributes. Second, dimensional reduction process does not take into account the clinical procedures that clinicians normally perform.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the attributes generated in the dimensional reduction process, when referring to the costing groupings of Feshki and Shijani's [2] research results, there are two costly checks, namely scintigraphy and fluoroscopy. A similar result is also made by Ahmadi et.al [3], a combination model of C5.0 with a neural network, which does not reduce both the costly attributes. Second, dimensional reduction process does not take into account the clinical procedures that clinicians normally perform.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Referring to the likelihood ratio, it can then be used to calculate the pre-test and post-test probability. The performance parameters can be formulated in the Equation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). pre − test odds = pre − test probability: (1 − pre − test probability)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistic regression was reported as the best classifier, providing 85% accuracy on the Statlog dataset. Furthermore, the performance of boosted C5.0 and NN were compared to predict CHD for the Cleveland dataset [24]. Based on the experiment, the authors concluded that there was no significant difference between C5.0 and NN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C5.0 decision trees and rule-based models have been first advanced by R. Quinlan in 1992, under the name "C4.5", which was an extension of a previous algorithm called Iterative Dichotomizer 3 (ID3); C4.5 was later improved into the new C5.0 classifier, which has superior efficiency [77]. C5.0 decision trees are versatile, swift and easy to use, and their use for QSAR modeling is seen as a reasonable option [78].…”
Section: Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%