2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201815403006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision making model design for antivirus software selection using Factor Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process

Abstract: Virus spread increase significantly through the internet in 2017. One of the protection method is using antivirus software. The wide variety of antivirus software in the market tends to creating confusion among consumer. Selecting the right antivirus according to their needs has become difficult. This is the reason we conduct our research. We formulate a decision making model for antivirus software consumer. The model is constructed by using factor analysis and AHP method. First we spread questionnaires to con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research (Saputri, 2018) on the selection of antivirus software for laboratories using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method resulted in AVG anti -virus being the right choice because it received the highest priority. Subsequent research with the title Decision making model design for antivirus software selection using Factor Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process produced The priority weight score factors are: Performance, Internal, Capacity, Security, Time (Nurhayati, Gautama, & Naseer, 2018). The results of research (Devi & Kumar, 2016)on an analysis of the type of anti -virus produced by Kaspersky anti -virus are the best antivirus software because of their good performance in the form of features, support and a satisfying user experience.The research conducted by (Niroomand, Mosallaeipour, & Mahmoodirad, 2020) producing a new modified version of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, the novelty includes overcoming the time interval value, keeping the possibility of choosing the best set of locations among all possible locations as well as for the managerial limitations of the problem.…”
Section: Literature Review Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research (Saputri, 2018) on the selection of antivirus software for laboratories using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method resulted in AVG anti -virus being the right choice because it received the highest priority. Subsequent research with the title Decision making model design for antivirus software selection using Factor Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process produced The priority weight score factors are: Performance, Internal, Capacity, Security, Time (Nurhayati, Gautama, & Naseer, 2018). The results of research (Devi & Kumar, 2016)on an analysis of the type of anti -virus produced by Kaspersky anti -virus are the best antivirus software because of their good performance in the form of features, support and a satisfying user experience.The research conducted by (Niroomand, Mosallaeipour, & Mahmoodirad, 2020) producing a new modified version of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, the novelty includes overcoming the time interval value, keeping the possibility of choosing the best set of locations among all possible locations as well as for the managerial limitations of the problem.…”
Section: Literature Review Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tujuan dari analisis faktor adalah untuk mendapatkan jumlah faktor yang lebih sedikit daripada (Nurhayati et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metodologiunclassified
“…The 2017 Internet Security Threat Report by Symantec [63], has exposed that the magnitude and seriousness of zero-day attacks in 2016 were vastly more significant than in previous years, with an unbelievable three billion attacks reported. As per the statistics about data breaches, hackers have been held responsible for the loss or theft of nearly nine billion data records since 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%