Behavioral Operations in Planning and Scheduling 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13382-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Making in Planning and Scheduling: A Field Study of Planning Behaviour in Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Berglund and Karltun (2007) studied the work of human schedulers in practice and concluded that a heavy cognitive load is imposed on them on a daily basis, with a large portion of this load consumed by problem-solving activities related to the handling of disturbances and unexpected events. Gasser, Fischer, and Wäfler (2011) also concluded that schedulers should be supported through the continuous development of their expertise and the provision of support information which is relevant to the decision-maker's knowledge structures. The proposed i-DESME framework addresses these considerations by generating a comprehensive model of the scheduler's cognitive system through standardised cognitive modelling methodologies (section 3.2.1).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Modelling Of Scheduling Processesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More recently, Berglund and Karltun (2007) studied the work of human schedulers in practice and concluded that a heavy cognitive load is imposed on them on a daily basis, with a large portion of this load consumed by problem-solving activities related to the handling of disturbances and unexpected events. Gasser, Fischer, and Wäfler (2011) also concluded that schedulers should be supported through the continuous development of their expertise and the provision of support information which is relevant to the decision-maker's knowledge structures. The proposed i-DESME framework addresses these considerations by generating a comprehensive model of the scheduler's cognitive system through standardised cognitive modelling methodologies (section 3.2.1).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Modelling Of Scheduling Processesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, Gralla et al, (2016) showed that the scheduler's perception evolves while scheduling and as a result, sensing evolves. At the same time, Gasser et al (2010) identified that decisions, disruptions and clarifications all trigger information exchange between the scheduler and other stakeholders, generating an update of the general state of knowledge to the scheduler and the stakeholders involved.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligent researchers claim that such behavior is algorithmic and can be replaced by an expert system [5,6]. However, the work of decisionsupport researchers revealed that the human decision behavior is non-algorithmic and differs somewhat from rational theories; because of certain factors that occur in real-time and can not be taken in advance by an algorithm [7,10,20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%