2019
DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_71_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-making in classifying gingival recession defects – A systematic review

Abstract: Background:Various classification systems have been devised to classify gingival recession defects (GRDs). Recent evidence has raised many questions on the use of currently popular classification systems. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess various classification systems in the light of the current scientific literature.Methods:A comprehensive and systematic search was done to identify literature related to classification systems for GRD. Sources included books, journals, and online database. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of gingival recessions is determined by the coronoapical extension (with or without involvement of the mucogingival junction) and the level of interproximal periodontal support 6 . In our case, as the interproximal support was intact and the coronoapical extension involved the mucogingival junction, the gingival recession at the mandibular left central incisor was classified as Miller Class II and Cairo Recession Type 1 (RT1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The classification of gingival recessions is determined by the coronoapical extension (with or without involvement of the mucogingival junction) and the level of interproximal periodontal support 6 . In our case, as the interproximal support was intact and the coronoapical extension involved the mucogingival junction, the gingival recession at the mandibular left central incisor was classified as Miller Class II and Cairo Recession Type 1 (RT1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[ 1 , 2 ] There are many classifications of GR defects. [ 3 ] The most widely used classification was proposed by Miller et al . [ 4 ] However, the workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases recommended the classification of Cairo et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%